branch distinction

As follows is a table of Branch Distinction colors found on officer shoulder boards and cuffs of Royal Navy uniforms per 1918 regulations, Merchant Navy livery as standardized by the British Board of Trade in 1918, U.S. Navy officer uniforms per 1919 U.S.N. uniform regulations, U.S. Army Transport Service regulations in effect from 1933-44, and United States Lines Steamship Co. rate detail from a 1937 passenger list brochure.

 

References

United States Lines SS Co. SS Washington Passenger List (Westbound) June 1937. United States Lines, New York, 1937


Although not fully detailed in the United States Lines chart, epaulets – or shoulder boards – followed the same design. Of interest is the fact that USL shoulder boards did not use the same button as the uniform coat.


Shoulder board, Royal South African Navy


Col.: Anon


buttons

Recently I came across a news item where the United States Navy once again redesigned its working uniform.  Over the past decade, sailors complained they did not like the blue and purple or kelp green digital camouflage uniforms issued them by the fleet, nor did they appreciate having to change uniforms to and from work – Navy regulations forbade work uniforms being seen off-base although this directive has since loosened.  The Navy cited the uniform’s unpopularity as a factor for the redesign, but the real impetus was that the uniform’s nylon-cotton blend in a fire “will burn robustly until completely consumed” – in other words: it melts into the skin.  The new uniform is fire retardant and has the innovation that instead of buttons, it uses only velcro and zippers. The selling point of the latter is it is perfect for the flight deck since the uniform would not be a vector for the introduction of debris into aircraft engines. Buttons no more? 

USN Black Anchor Button (gutta purcha), 1930s. Col.: IW.

The button is such a commonplace item that it is taken for granted and paid not much attention.  A button on a coat, shirt, or trousers is an ever-present – simple molded affair or complex construction.  And yet despite being so small, the uniform button is often laden with symbolism endemic to the organization that wears it.  In the American maritime profession, British traditions hold sway and along with them British forms and configuration of a uniform with the placement and design of buttons.  Fortuitously. coupled with fabric and insignia construction, buttons offer an excellent means of identifying the context of uniforms and their period of manufacture. and in the context of this project, where a seaman figured within a ship’s hierarchy.

Below, please find my reference collection, as well as an interesting button collection at the American Merchant Marine Museum – the Dollar Lines button, is amazing. I have another page devoted to the buttons of United States Lines, here.

Do note: I am not a button collector by any stretch of the imagination, but I keep a collection of buttons to assist with identifying and dating uniforms and uniform items. Buttons are one of those items easily overlooked, yet understanding them provides a wealth of information.


united states navy

Many United States Navy buttons were manufactured in England; however, with the emigration of British artisans to New England, a button industry sprang up in Connecticut. Many of these early buttons were of sophisticated composition and had fine detail. The Waterbury button (NA-113) is a good example of this craftsmanship; some contracts were better than others, and for mass-market buttons, items such as NA-115 could be had (this came from the estate of an ex-American Mail Lines quartermaster). The plain anchor button of the Chief Petty Officer is often confused with that of a general nautical button; however, each of the examples presented shows the variation on a theme. With the re-design of the CPO reefer from eight to six buttons, buttons once exclusively worn by officers became standard for CPOs. The buttons marked a CPO and in nickel were worn by officer wardroom stewards; by the 1940s, the nickel buttons came to be replaced by white plastic buttons.


united states government marine

Included in the “Government Marine” section of my button collection is a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers button. This button came from a reefer worn by a member of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Dredge Fleet – these individuals were (and are) civilians in the employ of the Army who keep U.S. waterways passable. Among these buttons is the seldom-seen U.S. Maritime Commission (U.S. Maritime Service) button for both ship’s officers and stewards; this button has been all but forgotten, but reflects the close affinity of the nascent U.S. Maritime Service (USMS) with the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG). In 1941, the training mission of USMS was removed from the USCG and placed under the jurisdiction of the War Shipping Administration (WSA); I discuss the changes in USMS insignia here. The button of the United States Merchant Marine Academy (USMMA GO-26 and GO26-B) is a bit less straightforward and I will write about it at length at another date; suffice to say, the USMMA button became a “catch-all” maritime button, despite the existence of a such a button for that explicit use (see “Merchant Marine Generic, obverse” below). The USMMA “steward” button is a prime example of this shift.


united states merchant marine, schools, and organizations

Of interest is the “generic” Merchant Marine button; it was sold by Leopold Morse, Company which was an upscale Boston clothier that had also dabbled in uniforming Union officers during the United States Civil War. This button is fascinating as it illustrates the NOMMP button, which is a derivation of one of the oldest American nautical buttons – the New York Yacht Club. I have a selection of United States Lines (USL) button detailed here. Unlike this page, I analyze the timeline of USL button adoption and wear.


american merchant marine museum collection

The AMMM collection of maritime buttons has an absolute jewel in the form of the Dollar Steamship Line button. This entity was in existence from 1929 through 1938, and was ultimately seized by the United States Maritime Commission. What makes this button of particular interest is how a previous owner had made an effort to both pick out and file down the two pillars in the dollar symbol, thereby making it an S. Another button of interest is the C on a swallowtail. What makes this button interesting is how the designer (presumably) followed traditional heraldic tincture rules – the flag field would be green and the C would be on a white lozenge. If the rules were followed, it would not be the flag of W.R. Chamberlin.


References

Albert, Alphaeus H. (1977). Record of American Uniform & Historical Buttons 1775-1976. Bicentennial Edition. Hightstown: Alphaeus H. Albert.

This is the classic button reference. It shows most of the Armed Services. Government, and Merchant Marine issues. It is incorrect in attribution for many merchant marine buttons and lacks dates – but, at least it shows the major varieties (something is better than nothing).

McGuinn, William and Bazelow, Bruce S. (2006). American Military Button Makers and Dealers; Their Backmarks & Dates. McLean, Virginia: William McGuinn & Brice S. Bazelow.

A catalog of backmarks along with brief histories of manufacturers.

VanCourt, Don. (1998). Transportation Uniform Buttons, Vol. III: Maritime and Aviation. Madison, New Jersey: Don VanCourt.

The only reference on commercial maritime uniform buttons; the author uses McGuinn and Bazelow to assist in cross-referencing button dates.

usmma uniforms: dress blues 1947-1951

dress blues, 1947-1951

The Cadet Corps did not start wearing round coats with double rows of buttons until July 1943 several months ahead of the dedication of Kings Point in September 1943. This same style of uniform was worn by midshipmen at Annapolis since at least the 1890s; the cut of which was standardized in the 1930s. Rationing and mass-production of uniforms took away some of the exquisite detail as found in round coats manufactured prior to the Second World War as is evident in this immediate post-war example (by comparison, see a 1940 Annapolis example).

Hoisting the flag, probably July 4, 1944. In Polaris, Vol. 2. No. 12, July 1944, p. 11.

The white belt with the polished brass buckle is from late war; the buckle’s style has remained the same for decades after its creation. It was worn over the waist, between the seventh and eighth buttons.

Insignia and Honor Awards of the United States Merchant Marine: The United States Merchant Marine Cadet Corps. 1944 . Col. AMMM from the collection of R. McNulty ephemera

This uniform was once owned by Edward F. Pfleging ’51 (Engine). He later became a Professor and Chief Engineer at State University of New York Maritime College at Fort Schuyler, in The Bronx, New York.

The absence of ribbons or decorations on the coat – with the noted exception of the U.S.N.R. badge – is not unexpected for the period. Kings Point was no longer a wartime school, rather an institution training mariners for a career in the U.S. commercial fleet along with a U.S. Naval Reserve service obligation.

usmma caps & cap badge timeline

kings point caps

The United States Maritime Commission Cadet Corps cap is the nucleus around which today’s headwear of the Regiment of Midshipmen at the United States Merchant Marine Academy is based. Following United States Navy regulations, the design of the original Cadet Corps cap was contemporary for the period: a standard Naval service cap with wide crown and wide visor. The following regulations created the distinctive maritime cap look which stood out from caps of the other armed services and maritime professions:

from: Uniform Regulations for United States Maritime Commission Cadet Corps, January 1, 1942.

The construction of the cap remained relatively static through the 1940s into the 1960s. With improvements in materials, the wicker frame was abandoned in the 1980s and was replaced with a lattice of plastic and synthetic fabrics; the waterproofed cotton poplins gave way to polyester blends – yet the overall appearance of the cap remained the same as the cap of 40 years prior. Re-thinking cap use, Bancroft – a major supplier of caps to the United States military and Merchant Marine Academy – patented a cap style known as “Pac-Cap” in the 1950s. This style enabled the cap owner to fold the stiffener forward by use of hinges for travel purposes and to allow for immediate and flawless cap appearance when unpacked. Despite the innovation lasting into the 1990s, these caps never made their way to Kings Point.

Interestingly enough, the Kings Point Ships Store throughout the 1940s and 1970s removed all manufacturer’s labels from the caps and substituted their own, making tracking down cap suppliers problematic – luckily some left clues on the inside of sweatbands. In recent years, the Academy has procured men’s caps from Bernard Cap Company and women’s caps from Sam Bonk Uniform Cap Company.

high pressure caps vs. covers

At present, caps worn by the Regiment of Midshipmen are referred to as “high pressure covers.” The etymology of the term has its roots in seamen’s union argot of the late 1930s when the caps were called “high pressure caps.” Quite simply, the term was meant to evoke the crisp and snappy appearance of a “cruise ship line” officer’s cap: the cap cover was flush and the cap itself fit snug and squared-away on the wearer’s head. To the imaginative, these caps resembled the car radiator cap, which was also known as a high pressure cap. The term was a mildly derisive and spoke to the divide between the ship’s unlicensed crew with their rumpled workman’s clothes and the spit-and-polish image of licensed officers aboard liners – in the eyes of the former, the latter did not do “real work” and avoided mingling with the hoi polloi below decks. In some union hiring halls, if an individual came in wearing such a cap, it would be forcibly removed and thrown to the rafters. On the other hand, an acceptable cap for someone to wear would be a cap without a flat wire stiffener – which in maritime parlance is called a “grommet” – with a relaxed, floppy cover. These caps were allegedly worn by individuals less concerned with appearance than with doing their job.

“Happenings in Mobile.” The Seafarers’ Log: Official Organ of the Atlantic and Gulf Seamen (Seafarers’ International Union of North America). Vol. I, No. 7. Friday, April 7, 1939, p. 8. The first instance of “high pressure cap” in a union publication poking fun at the dress of young dandies – or pointedly, U.S. Maritime Commission cadets.

When cadet-midshipmen reported aboard ship for their Sea Year, they often came smartly dressed in their newly-issued uniforms and immaculate caps. More often than not, they sailed on freighters or oilers where their dress was incongruous, to say the least. The unionized, unlicensed crew ribbed them for their appearance and insulted their high-pressure caps. After months at sea, cadets brought the salty term back with them to Kings Point where it was passed from class to class. Over time, Kings Pointers began to use United States Navy terminology for uniform items as the Commandant’s office came to be managed by ex-Navymen. For them, caps were known as “combination covers”; thus, the term became “high pressure cover” and in the process, a biting pejorative was remade into a uniquely Kings Point term.


kings point cap badges 1939-1946

At its outset, what distinguished Cadet Corps caps from those of other maritime organizations was its cap badge. The first cap badge was an oversized fouled anchor device and its wear is noted in 1939. This cap badge was in use until October 1943 and completely phased out in February 1944, when Cadet Corps exclusively wore a United States Naval Academy midshipman cap device. Asserting its own identity in the post-war years, the Academy adopted the current defaced the United States Naval Academy midshipman cap badge on February 1, 1946. The 1946 cap badge has remained the cap badge design used by the Regiment up until the present day.



Cadetships in the Merchant Marine of the United States, October 17, 1939 (cover).

The 1939 cadet cap badge is without a design precedent. Its wear remained a constant throughout the Cadet Corps’ early years up until the Dedication of the United States Merchant Marine Academy on September 30, 1943. The replacement of the 1939 cap badge by the United States Naval Academy midshipman cap badge is puzzling, and the exact date for the latter’s adoption is unknown. However, its replacement occurred at some point between October and November 1943. During the month of October 1943, while the First Class Council was actively tinkering with the idea of War Shipping Administration “Ships for Victory” insignia to be worn on cadet-midshipmen collars, the Cadet Corps was made aware of the issue of Merchant Marine Service Emblems by the Seamen’s Service Awards Committee. It is probable that the aforementioned in concert with Dedication compelled Kings Pointers to align themselves closely with the Naval Service. Since cadet-midshipmen were in the United States Naval Reserve, the United States Naval Academy and USNR midshipman cap badge served to emphasize the fact that Kings Pointers were members of the same tribe.

Polaris, April 1944 (cover).
A singular appearance of the embroidered USNA cap badge.

The stamped metal cap badge of 1943-1944 was undoubtedly issued at the Cadet Basic School San Mateo and worn through early 1944 as images of cadet-midshipmen after their return from Sea Year and reporting at Kings Point attest. The often incongruous appearance of two types of cap badges in period photographs and publications point to a policy of cap badges and devices not undergoing immediate replacement when regulations changed or fashion dictated; instead, the local Ships Store issued incoming sections new devices upon arrival at the Cadet Basic schools or to individuals who wished to purchase the new cap devices – any uniform insignia was purchased by the cadet-midshipman. Thus, if there was a wear-out period, as was the case in the United States Navy, cadet-midshipmen did the same unless so compelled.


Preceding Richard R. McNulty’s assumption of the post of Academy superintendent by two months, the Cadet Corps issued its first post-war book of regulations, United States Merchant Marine Cadet Corps Regulations and Instructions on February 1, 1946. Part IV “Uniform Regulation for the United States Merchant Marine Cadet Corps” defined the style of a new cap device for the Cadet Corps:

from United States Merchant Marine Cadet Corps Regulations and Instructions,Part IV “Uniform Regulation for the United States Merchant Marine Cadet Corps” IV-16, February 1, 1946.

This new cap badge was disbursed in September 1946 just prior to the Academy’s funeral services for Captain Tomb – some months after its appearance in the 1946 Regulations. With this cap badge, there was no wear-out, since it was issued Academy-wide at once. It is fitting that while the Cadet Corps paid tribute to King Points’ first superintendent, the 1946 cap badge, also paid homage to the legacy of President Franklin D. Roosevelt with its inclusion of the Merchant Marine emblem in miniature that he authorized for all Merchant Mariners. This cap badge encapsulates the dual nature of the education a Kings Pointer receives: the training of a licensed merchant marine officer and a military one akin to that of a midshipman at Annapolis. The cap badge also points to when the Cadet Corps came into its own: the Second World War.

from Polaris, November 1946. Photograph taken ca September 1946.
First published image of the 1946 cap badge.

kings point publications

For the over seventy-five year existence of the United States Merchant Marine Academy, there is a small trove of publications detailing the quotidian of the Regiment. Find below a collection of documents put out over the years by both the Regiment and the Alumni Association.


The White Paper

The appearance in early 1969 of “The Recommendations of the Corps of Midshipmen” or “The White Paper” – as it came to be known – was nothing short of a revelation for Kings Pointers and shook Academy leadership to the core. This single document dismantled the regimental system and brought the Zombo in open confrontation with the Superintendant. It also resulted in the suspension of the student magazine, Polaris.

Thanks are due to Marion Bates for making the text available.


Bearings Book

Otherwise known as the “Plebe Bible.” Each service academy had its own version of “plebe knowledge” and was named differently by each academy. Kings Point’s was first known as Bearings; it was first funded by the United States Merchant Marine Academy Academy Alumni Association; in later years it became the province of the Commandant’s Office and assumed the name of the U.S. Naval Academy’s book and was renamed Reef Points (click link for USNA 1934-1935 version).

The publication of Bearings began in 1946 and had irregular printings; please find the second volume from 1956 and the third from 1964, as well as an interesting issue from 1983, and USMMA Reef Points from 2014. The 1983 issue, like that of 1946, was comprised of loose pages, held together by paper fasteners to allow for page replacement in the event of revision. Errata from 1983 show this issue of Bearings publication was for 1978.

Following USMMA Reef Points from 2014 is “2017 Uniform Regulations 11-August (Final).” Bearings/Reef Points no longer was a single point of reference for all Midshipman knowledge, it was supplanted by a series of independent circulars published by both the Regiment and Commandant’s Office.

Col.: IW


Midships

Yearbook of the Regiment of Midshipmen published from 1944 until the present day.

 

Col.: USMMAAF


Polaris

Student magazine of the Regiment. This publication existed between 1942 and 1972. In the late-1960s there were Administration-enforced breaks in publication.

Col.: USMMAAF & IW


United States Merchant Marine Cadet Corps and Its Academy: Individual and Group Data on the Faculty March 1, 1948

Prior to the re-organization of the the United States Maritime Service, a survey was conducted of the faculty at Kings Point and the Basic schools. The document offers a glimpse into the credentials and careers of the first generation of Kings Pointers.

Col.: AMMM


A Kings Point Glossary

An irreverent, insensitive, offensive, and derisive glossary of terms used by Kings Point midshipmen appeared around 2017; although it may have been published much earlier. The terms were collected by an anonymous Kings Point midshipman. As a document, it alludes to toxic views of midshipmen regarding relationships and sometimes confrontational attitudes of midshipmen toward Academy leadership and the Regiment.

I scrapped this material from the Dark Web; it has since disappeared. Pieces of it have appeared in online forums.

 

usmm uniforms: slate gray uniform, 1943

On 16 April 1943 the Chief of Naval Personnel sent a letter to “All Ships and Stations” causing nothing short of a tempest in a teapot. The order authorized the creation of the working slate gray uniform (this uniform is known alternately as “working grays” or simply “grays”). As uniforms go, this one was immediately unpopular among all those mandated to wear it and was so divisive that it was unofficially banned for wear in the Pacific Fleet. Despite its unpopularity, it remained an option for inclusion in seabags until 15 October 1948 and was finally abolished on 15 October 1949. Since the U.S. Navy set the style for uniforms worn by the seagoing professions during the Second World War, examples of the uniform occasionally appear with United Maritime Service insignia affixed.

In the early days of the Second World War, the United States Navy found itself without a transitional uniform to bridge the gap between semi-formal wear and one which could withstand the rigors of shipboard work – and keep those in command positions identified as such. Dungarees were a common item worn by enlisted sailors and officers alike; the only difference was the cap – seamen wore the white cap whereas officers and chief petty officers wore a cap with a visor. Regulations forbade the wear of such clothing offbase or in an office setting; thus U.S. Navy leadership took a cue from their aviators who adopted U.S. Army workwear – and clothed all officers in khaki uniforms with removable collar insignia denoting branch and rank (vid. ALNAV 16, 21 February 1941 – digest in Bureau of Navigation Bulletin, No. 291, April 26, 1941, p. 28). This proved a popular solution and soon most officers and chief petty officers wore their khakis with pride. As for the grays, bit of background on this uniform is useful.

The adoption of grays was not so much a practical matter than one of service pride. Fleet Admiral of the U.S. Navy Ernest J. King felt khakis smacked too much of the United States Army and wanted a proper Navy uniform; he saw this in the slate gray which he had a hand in designing. Yet, the slate gray was not Admiral King’s first foray into a uniform’s redesign. In the name of camouflage, he once ordered all enlisted sailors on the USS Texas to dye one of their white uniforms brown in a vat of coffee; this was an experiment that failed – as the sailors ended up with uneven colors ranging from “ecru to chocolate brown.” Admiral King gave up on that idea, but continued to tinker with uniforms as a staff of his related:

Vice Admiral Harry Sanders (1974). “King of the Oceans,” Naval Institute Proceedings, Vol. 100, August 1974. p. 56.

Legend has it Admiral King admired the Royal Air Force gray uniform so much he had his own herringbone twill version made up in U.S. Navy cut; and, his wife had a hand in the design the distinctive shoulder boards For him, grays were an instant sartorial success; thus began his offensive on the working khaki – which incidentally he authorized in an ALNAV in April 1941. Nevertheless, a full two years later, the working khaki was fast-tracked for abolition.

Not content with simply adding a new work uniform to replace the khaki, Admiral King decided to re-think the traditional service dress blue uniform – the classic officer rig of a reefer with six buttons – several months later after the announcement of the grays. With the adoption of grays, the khaki uniform was to be phased out. For visor caps (combination caps), the idea was gold chinstraps and scrambled eggs on visors would only be worn with dress blue and white uniforms; for service dress blues, and working khakis and working grays, the visor cap would have a black chinstrap with black buttons and plain visors. Muddling matters, blue service dress coats (reefers) would be worn with a gray instead of a white shirt – the gray shirt would have the collar insignia approved for the khaki shirt. As a cost-saving measure, the reefer was to have stripes on the outside of the cuff, and not all the way around. Grays also had blue-black plastic buttons, and the initial working gray shoulder boards were rounded at the top and covered in gray cloth with rank denoted by black lace.

Officers protested loudly about the changes in headwear, and the cap idea that came forth in June 1943 was scrapped after a month on the books – although scrambled eggs remained abolished for the duration of the war except in full dress. Officers also did not like the mix-and-match shirt situation; white shirts continued to be worn with reefers and gray with grays. Finding and buying shoulders boards was problematic; in August 1943, the standard Navy-blue with gold lace shoulder boards were authorized for wear with the working gray uniform. The blue-black plastic buttons on grays were made optional and gold buttons were authorized. The relaxed regulations on gold buttons and traditional shoulder boards were rescinded in 1946. Yet, prior to the reversal, local commands were given latitude in determining what shoulder boards and buttons were appropriate for wear.

SecNav BuPers-329-MEB 29 May 1946 Enclosure A prior to policy reversal.

As for cap ornamentation, only the standard U.S. Navy Officer cap badge was authorized on visor caps with gray covers. Some collectors of U.S. Navy insignia claim large-size bronze U.S. Navy Officer cap badges were worn – this is incorrect; the only bronze cap badges manufactured during the Second World War were miniature devices for wear on the visor caps of U.S. Navy Officers assigned to U.S. Marine Corps units (vid. BuPers Circ. Letter 47-44, 31 March 1944). Other collectors surmise black full-size cap badges were worn; however, these are post-war Balfour productions for use on pith helmets in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War. The black cap badges are an early (failed) example of the U.S. Navy’s attempt to subdue all metal insignia. The logic is understandable given the Navy’s mania for matching insignia components – although grays tossed all reason aside!

With the constant re-writing of regulations in an attempt to appeal to those who were to wear the uniform, the working gray was never as popular as the working khaki uniform. The working khaki was never abolished – with the nation at war, khakis were awash in the disbursement system and the procurement of grays’ fabric competed with soldier’s fatigues since they were of the same weight; and, since clothing the infantry was of tantamount priority, a uniform redo for the U.S. Navy officer and petty officer community was of secondary importance. When Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz succeeded Admiral King in 1944, he reversed the order to abolish the working khaki uniform. Nevertheless, the sometimes derisively called, “Bus driver gray,” “Dishwater gray,” “King gray,” or “Confederate Navy” uniform remained mainly worn on the East Coast, but eventually migrated to the Pacific Theater of Operations with by war’s end – much to the chagrin of Admiral Nimitz, no doubt. However, with Admiral King’s retirement, the working gray uniform went along with him.

Although United States Maritime Service did not have regulations on the books governing the wear of working grays, it was worn by East Coast ship’s officers and at USMS officer-upgrade schools.

slate gray uniform, usmm


slate gray garrison cap, usms

The full dittybag entry for the garrison cap is here.


Of particular interest with this uniform are the blackened bronze buttons and the either “vegetable ivory” or rubber buttons. These are positively black instead of the blue-black of U.S. Navy regulations and are the star-anchor-star design of the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Cadet Corps. The shoulder boards are those of a third mate with cap-bodkin buttons of the same pattern as the buttons on the coat.

However, the presence of the buttons is not proof of the uniform being worn or issued at Kings Point – I have no photographic evidence of cadet-midshipmen ever wearing grays – only a graduate (see below). These same buttons were worn by members of the ATS; thus it may be a case of button re-appropriation by suppliers. And ATS deck officers did wear these generic shoulder boards. Yet, the USNR badge in combination with the junior rank does point to the owner being a Kings Pointer.

The garrison cap was in the pocket of the working gray uniform’s coat. It is not as faded as the rest of the uniform and is in relatively good condition. Both visor and garrison cap were authorized for wear with grays. A garrison cap would be worn solely aboard ship or at shore installations; a visor cap could be worn “walking out.”

If we are to follow U.S. Navy regulations for the placement of the rank insignia, the rank pin is supposed to be on the seam. In taking a closer look at the rank device on the cap, it does not match the lace on the boards affixed to the coat – it does match an unphotographed pair of USMS lieutenant boards that were in the pocket along with the cap.

Academy-issued uniform? Probably not. Kings Pointer in the employ of the ATS? Possibly maybe. But probably not since the Army at the time, as lax as it was with uniforms, didn’t appreciate USMS insignia on its uniforms. A Kings Pointer in the Merchant Service? Definitely maybe.


The above photograph – circa August 1945 – is a clear example of the working gray uniform as worn by a graduate of Kings Point. Although it is often difficult to determine whether a uniform is khaki or gray due to similarities in shading in period black and white photographs; the cut of the pockets indicate this uniform is indeed gray – during the Second World War, working gray coats have patch pockets, not bellows style like a khaki coat. Of note is the use of the embroidered USNR badge – more often than not, this was used on gray uniforms and not on khaki uniforms; the use of the USNR badge on my uniform detailed above is not common, but not unheard of.


Col.: Ed Stevens.

The above is one of the few photographs I have come across of a Merchant Marine officer wearing grays – judging by the gilt buttons and shoulder boards with gold lace, date this photograph as being taken in 1943. His rank is a bit tricky: if his shoulder boards are USMS – he is either a first mate aboard a troopship or the skipper of a Liberty or oiler; if his boards are Merchant Marine, he is most probably a first mate.

usna dress blues 1940

This round coat was issued to Thaddeus John Jakubowski of Michigan upon his matriculation at the U.S. Naval Academy on September 13, 1940. This coat has the class stripe of a midshipman first-class; it was undoubtedly last worn when Mr. Jakubowski upon his graduation and when he left the Academy Yard on June 9, 1943. Unlike his peers at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, he wore no insignia or badges on his uniform.

References:
Annapolis Capital Newspaper. Wednesday, June 09, 1943, page 3.

usl seamen uniforms

United States Lines Seamen Uniforms

United States Lines uniformed its unlicensed seamen in garb quite similar to that worn by sailors in the U.S. Navy. Besides being an economic measure where the company did not need to have custom work done by ship chandlers in New York since the uniforms were readily available, having a ship’s crew wear a uniform like those of their military counterparts both promoted a professional appearance and acted as a visual metaphor for the passenger: they could link the crew ‘s uniforms to those of the U.S. Navy and quickly determine a crew member’s place within the ship’s hierarchy.

Many uniform components were shared; however, USL did deviate from the U.S. Navy. A distinct difference may be seen in the Winter dress and undress trousers; whereas the U.S. Navy sailor wore 13-button trousers, the USL seaman wore trousers with a fly. Some companies went as far as to change the buttons on the uniforms they provided to their ship’s crew; USL did not follow this pattern – buttons on unlicensed crew uniforms were plain – e.g. on the P-coat, unlike the U.S, Navy their buttons lacked anchors and stars. And unlike the U.S. Navy, USL crews did not wear rank or rate badges.

All images are from col.: AMM HAI-653 “Personnel USL sailor in winter Uniform to Herbert W. Zink”


Note: photograph captions are from notes penciled on the back of each or from archive descriptions.

graham covert

Graham C. Covert started his maritime career as a cadet at the New York Nautical School, served with the U.S. Navy Reserve Force as a Quartermaster during the First World War, and then worked on Standard Oil Company of New Jersey tankers and coastwise ships up until the Second World War. After he was called up for active duty with the U.S. Navy, he served aboard the USS Republic and the USS Rocky Mount. He was a plank owner on the USS Rocky Mount and he saw service aboard her throughout her wartime career – from 1943 until at least November 1945 – for most of the period she acted in the role of flagship. No easy feat under the scrutiny of admirals and the ship’s captain, as Executive Officer, he guided the crew through the major U.S. Navy campaigns in the Marshalls, the Marianas, retaking Guam, Tinian, combat in Leyte, Luzon, Mindanao landings, and support of Borneo operations. He was involved briefly in occupation duties in September of 1945 and served on the Yangtze and later Shanghai from September to November of 1945. He rounded out his active duty tour as Assistant Port Director of Naval Operating Base, San Pedro while assigned to the Naval Transport Service. He was separated from the Naval service in 1946, but remained a reserve officer. In 1950, he received his final rank in the USNR as Captain. He passed away five years later at the age of 61.

He left behind a trove of documents charting the arc of his career.

nyns regulations

documents

usnr fitness reports

medals

professional résumé

extant crew lists (port of new york)

 

uss rocky mount

Graham C. Covert’s ship, USS Rocky Mount arrived at Pearl Harbor, December 27, 1943 and never left the combat area of the Pacific. Dubbed “The Rock” and “Veteran Queen of Amphibious Fleets”, she came through all of the operations unscathed. She was decommissioned and placed in the reserve fleet as part of the San Francisco Group, Pacific Fleet, on March 22, 1947. She remained in this status until she was struck from the Navy List on July 1, 1960. As her XO, Graham C. Covert saw her through all of her battles.