Portuguese Civilian Maritime Rescues of Allied/Axis/Neutral Personnel in the Second World War

I have a pretty medal in my collection from Portugal – I have always considered it one of the more interesting ones I have. It has an Angel of Victory and the motto, “Reconhecimento da Nação” on the obverse. It is officially known as the “Medalha Comemorativa do Esforço dos Tripulantes da Marinha Mercante Durante a Guerra de 1939-1945” [Commemorative Medal for the Effort of Merchant Marine Crews During the War of 1939-1945] per the reverse.

Right after the Second World War, the Republic of Portugal promulgated Decree/Law 38515 of 19 November 1951 (in Government Gazette no. 241/1951, Series I of 1951-11-19) created a medal to commemorate the efforts of both crews of merchant ships of “high and distant sea” and fishing vessels during the 1939-1945 war. To be eligible for the medal, individuals must have been a crew member aboard a Portuguese vessel for at least one year, although the period of service was waived for those who were aboard when their vessel was attacked or sunk. The law stated that the medal was bronze and suspended from a green and red ribbon, and worn on the right breast. In 1970, the law was amended to provide a medal with the same obverse and a white and red moiré ribbon for (Decree 568/70 of 20 November 1970); on 9 August, the award of the medal ceased (Decree/Law 329/85 of 9 August 1985).

The perpetual joke among my children is that I am interested in sunk merchant marine Portuguese ships in Hawai’i. So, since I have a Portuguese Merchant Marine medal, and since the recipients of the medal could potentially have been involved in rescues of crew members of sinking ships, I thought that I’d do a little research on the topic. And I was quite surprised.


Portugal’s neutral merchant marine and fishing fleet conducted extensive rescues of Allied and Axis personnel during the Second World War, often under hazardous conditions. Below is a detailed account of key operations, vessels, and personnel involved.

Fishing and Auxiliary Vessels

  • White Fleet cod-fishing schooners: Assisted in rescues after U-boat attacks, though specific vessel names are rarely documented. These vessels had been painted white and marked as Portuguese to avoid attacks (although this neutrality was not always recognized).
  • Improvised naval flotilla (1941): Included merchant ships like Cubango (seaplane carrier) and trawlers mobilized for coastal defense and rescue operations. 1 5

Rescues by Civilian Portuguese Vessels 1939-1941

Portuguese Vessel
DateRescued Vessel (Nationality)Survivors RescuedCasualties (Rescued Vessel)
Carvalho Araújo (merchant)7-Aug-1939Manaar (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Ana I (merchant)10-Jul-1940Aghios Nicolaos (Greek)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Serpa Pinto (merchant)8-Oct-1940Antonios Chandris (Greek)22Not specified 2
Nyassa (merchant)20-Mar-1941Andaluzian (British)23Not specified 2
Gorgulho (merchant)25-Apr-1941Aurillac (unknown)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Angola (merchant)4-May-1941Wray Castle (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Mirandella (merchant)7-May-1941Queen Maud (unknown)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Ás de Paus & Pátria e Liberdade (merchant)10-May-1941Martin Pecheur (unknown)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Ganda (merchant)23-May-1941British Grenadier (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Tarrafal (merchant)31-May-1941Clan Macdougall (British)85Not specified 2
Malange (merchant)15-Jun-1941Djurjura (unknown)Not specifiedNot specified
Maria Terceiro (merchant)19-Jun-1941Empire Warrior (British)Not specifiedNot specified
Alferrarede (merchant)14-Aug-1941Lucrecia (unknown)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Labrador (fishing schooner)?-?-1942Delães (Portuguese)Full crew0 (Delães sank, crew saved)

Carvalho Araújo

Rescue of the British Cargo Ship Manaar (7 September 1939)

Event: On September 7, 1939, the Portuguese passenger/cargo liner Carvalho Araújo encountered a lifeboat carrying 16 Indian crewmen from the British cargo ship Manaar, which had been sunk hours earlier by German submarine U-38.

Rescue Details: The survivors were spotted adrift and picked up by Carvalho Araújo. Other survivors from Manaar were also rescued by the Italian ship Castelbianco and the Dutch ship Mars, with all survivors eventually landed in Lisbon.

Outcome: The rescued men were safely brought to Lisbon. The rescue was noted as the first by a Portuguese ship of the Second World War, occurring just days after the war began.

Casualties: Of Manaar’s crew, 7 of 63 died; the rest were rescued by the three ships.

Interesting Note: The rescue highlighted Portugal’s early humanitarian role, with Carvalho Araújo acting swiftly in the opening days of the Second World War to save lives regardless of nationality1.

Alferrarede

Rescue of Lucrecia (7 July 1940)

Event: On July 7, 1940, the Portuguese merchant ship Alferrarede found survivors from the vessel Lucrecia, which had been sunk by belligerent action.

Rescue Details: The survivors, adrift in the Atlantic, were brought aboard Alferrarede and taken to safety. The event was reported in the Portuguese press as another example of the country’s maritime solidarity.

Outcome: Survivors were landed safely in Portugal.

Casualties: Not specified in available records.

Interesting Note: This rescue reinforced the pattern of Portuguese civilian ships providing aid to shipwrecked sailors, regardless of their flag1.

Ana I

Rescue of Aghios Nicolaos (7 October 1940)

Event: On October 7, 1940, the Portuguese merchant ship Ana I rescued the crew of the Greek merchant vessel Aghios Nicolaos, which had been sunk by a German U-boat.

Rescue Details: The Greek sailors, exposed and adrift, were brought aboard Ana I and landed safely in Portugal.

Outcome: The entire crew was saved and returned to safety.

Casualties: Not specified.

Interesting Note: The rescue was acknowledged in Greek diplomatic channels, with thanks extended to the Portuguese for their humanitarian action1.

Serpa Pinto

Rescue of Antonios Chandris (8 October 1940)

Event: On October 8, 1940, the Portuguese liner Serpa Pinto was en route to Brazil when it spotted distress signals from a lifeboat.

Rescue Details: Aboard were 22 Greek sailors from the Antonios Chandris, sunk by the German raider Widder. The survivors had drifted for weeks, some so weak they had to be carried aboard. Their rescue was widely reported, and the survivors later returned to Europe on the same ship, greeted in Lisbon by Greek officials.

Outcome: All 22 were rescued and eventually returned home.

Casualties: None among this group, though their ordeal was severe.

Interesting Note: The Serpa Pinto became a symbol of Portugal’s humanitarian neutrality, later also transporting refugees from Nazi-occupied Europe1.

Nyassa

Rescue of Andaluzian (20 March 1941)

Event: On March 20, 1941, the passenger liner Nyassa picked up 23 survivors from the British ship Andaluzian, torpedoed in the Atlantic.

Rescue Details: The survivors were rescued from rough seas and landed at a Portuguese port.

Outcome: 23 men were brought to safety.

Casualties: Not specified.

Interesting Note: Nyassa was also known for transporting refugees from Europe to the Americas during the war1.

Gorgulho

Rescue of Aurillac (25 April 1941)

Event: On April 25, 1941, the Gorgulho rescued survivors from the Aurillac, a vessel lost to wartime action.

Rescue Details: Survivors were brought aboard and later landed safely.

Outcome: Survivors saved; details on numbers not specified.

Casualties: Not specified.

Interesting Note: The rescue was one of several by Portuguese ships during the dangerous spring of 19411.

Angola

Rescue of Wray Castle (4 May 1941)

Event: On May 4, 1941, the Portuguese liner Angola found and rescued survivors from the British ship Wray Castle, sunk by a U-boat.

Rescue Details: The rescued sailors were taken to Lisbon.

Outcome: Allied seamen saved and landed in Portugal.

Casualties: Not specified.

Interesting Note: The Angola was a regular on colonial routes and played a key humanitarian role during the war1.

Mirandella

Rescue of Queen Maud (7 May 1941)

Event: On May 7, 1941, Mirandella found and rescued the shipwrecked crew of the Queen Maud, another victim of submarine warfare.

Rescue Details: Survivors were given shelter and landed in Portugal.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Ás de Paus & Pátria e Liberdade

Rescue of Martin Pecheur (10 May 1941)

Event: On May 10, 1941, two Portuguese ships, Ás de Paus and Pátria e Liberdade, jointly rescued survivors from the Martin Pecheur.

Rescue Details: The survivors, adrift in the Atlantic, were brought to safety by the combined efforts of both crews.

Outcome: Survivors landed safely.

Casualties: Not specified.

Ganda

Rescue of British Grenadier (23 May 1941)

Event: On May 23, 1941, Ganda found survivors from the British tanker British Grenadier, sunk by a U-boat.

Rescue Details: The rescued men were landed at Lisbon.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Tarrafal

Rescue of Clan Macdougall (31 May 1941)

Event: On May 31, 1941, Tarrafal performed one of the largest single rescues by a Portuguese merchant ship, picking up 85 survivors from the British ship Clan Macdougall, sunk in the Atlantic.

Rescue Details: The survivors, many suffering from exposure, were landed in Portugal and received medical care.

Outcome: 85 men saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Interesting Note: This was among the largest single rescues by a Portuguese merchant vessel during the war1.

Malange

Rescue of Djurjura (15 June 1941)

Event: On June 15, 1941, Malange rescued survivors from the Djurjura, a vessel lost to wartime action.

Rescue Details: Survivors were brought aboard and landed safely.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Maria Terceiro

Rescue of Empire Warrior (19 June 1941)

Event: On June 19, 1941, Maria Terceiro picked up the crew of the Empire Warrior, a British merchant ship sunk by a U-boat.

Rescue Details: The rescued crew were landed in Portugal.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Santa Princesa

Rescue of Designer (10 July 1941)

Event: On July 10, 1941, Santa Princesa found survivors from the Designer, a ship lost to belligerent action.

Rescue Details: Survivors were brought to safety.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Sultana

Rescue of Auditor (16 July 1941)

Event: On July 16, 1941, Sultana rescued the shipwrecked crew of the Auditor near the Cape Verde islands.

Rescue Details: Survivors were taken aboard and landed safely.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Saudades

Rescue of Holmside (24 July 1941)

Event: On July 24, 1941, Saudades found crew members from the Holmside, a ship lost to belligerent action.

Rescue Details: Survivors were brought aboard and landed safely.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Altair

Rescue of Ida Knudsen (25 July 1941)

Event: On July 25, 1941, Altair found two lifeboats from the Ida Knudsen, a ship sunk by belligerent action.

Rescue Details: Survivors were rescued from the lifeboats and taken to safety.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

África Ocidental & Maria Leonor

Rescue of Horn Shell (6 August 1941)

Event: On August 6, 1941, África Ocidental and Maria Leonor found castaways from the Horn Shell, a ship sunk by belligerent action.

Rescue Details: Survivors were picked up and landed safely.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Gronelândia

Rescue of Trinidad (25 September 1941)

Event: On September 25, 1941, Gronelândia picked up castaways from the Trinidad, a ship lost to wartime action.

Rescue Details: Survivors were brought aboard and landed safely.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Rescues by Civilian Portuguese Vessels 1942

Portuguese VesselDateRescued Vessel (Nationality)Survivors RescuedCasualties (if known)
João Corte Real22-Jan-1942Gandia (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Cunene27-Mar-1942Svenør (Norwegian)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Cunene & Lobito06-Apr-1942Koll (Norwegian)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Almirante Sousa e Faro07-Jul-1942Dago (unknown)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Maria Amélia & Mirandella27-May-1942Polyphemus (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Argus10-Jun-1942Empire Clough (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Nacala11-Jun-1942Mahronda, Hellenic TraderNot specifiedNot specified 2
Angoche II12-Jun-1942Cliftonhall (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Pedro Nunes27-Aug-1942Clan Macwhirter (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Cubango12-Sep-1942Trevilley (British)15Not specified 2
Cubango14-Sep-1942Breedijk (Dutch)13Not specified 2
Portuguese Fishing Boats19-Sep-1942HMT Alouette (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Mouzinho19-Sep-1942Baron Ogilvy (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Lourenço Marques30-Nov-1942Cleanthis (Greek)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Luso10-Aug-1942Medon (unknown)Not specifiedNot specified 2

João Corte Real

Rescue of Gandia (22 January 1942)

Event: On January 22, 1942, the Portuguese merchant ship João Corte Real encountered survivors from the British cargo ship Gandia, which had been torpedoed and sunk by a German U-boat off the Azores.

Rescue Details: Survivors were found adrift in lifeboats, exhausted and suffering from exposure. The crew of João Corte Real brought them aboard, provided food and medical attention, and transported them to safety in the Azores.

Outcome: Survivors were landed safely and received by local authorities.

Casualties: Not specified.

Interesting Note: The Gandia sinking was one of several in the Azores area during the intense U-boat campaign of early 1942.

Cunene

Rescue of Svenør (27 March 1942) and Koll (6 April 1942)

Event: On March 27, 1942, the Portuguese ship Cunene found survivors from the Norwegian cargo ship Svenør, and on April 6, 1942, Cunene and Lobito jointly rescued crew members from the Norwegian ship Koll, both sunk by U-boats.

Rescue Details: Survivors were picked up in the Atlantic and landed safely in Portuguese ports. The rescues were coordinated with other Portuguese ships, demonstrating the effectiveness of civilian maritime networks.

Outcome: Survivors from both vessels were saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Interesting Note: These rescues highlighted Portugal’s role as a neutral safe haven for Allied and neutral sailors in the Atlantic.

Almirante Sousa e Faro

Rescue of Dago (7 July 1942)

Event: On July 7, 1942, the Almirante Sousa e Faro found the crew of the Dago, a ship sunk by belligerent action.

Rescue Details: The survivors were taken aboard and provided with care, then delivered to the nearest port.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Maria Amélia and Mirandella

Rescue of Polyphemus (27 May 1942)

Event: On May 27, 1942, the Portuguese ships Maria Amélia and Mirandella jointly found and rescued the crew of the Polyphemus, a British ship sunk by a U-boat.

Rescue Details: Survivors were picked up from lifeboats and cared for on board, then landed at a Portuguese port.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Argus

Rescue of Empire Clough (10 June 1942)

Event: On June 10, 1942, the Argus found survivors from the Empire Clough, a British merchantman sunk by a U-boat.

Rescue Details: The survivors, suffering from dehydration and exposure, were brought aboard and landed safely.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Nacala

Rescue of Mahronda and Hellenic Trader (11 June 1942)

Event: On June 11, 1942, Nacala found crew members from the Mahronda and towed survivors from the Hellenic Trader, both British ships sunk by belligerent action.

Rescue Details: Survivors were rescued from lifeboats and towed to safety.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Angoche II

Rescue of Cliftonhall (12 June 1942)

Event: On June 12, 1942, Angoche II helped survivors from the Cliftonhall, a British ship sunk by a U-boat.

Rescue Details: Survivors were picked up and landed safely.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Pedro Nunes

Rescue of Clan Macwhirter (27 August 1942)

Event: On August 27, 1942, the Portuguese merchant ship Pedro Nunes found survivors from the Clan Macwhirter, a British cargo ship sunk by a German U-boat.

Rescue Details: Survivors were picked up from lifeboats and cared for on board, then landed at a Portuguese port.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Cubango

Rescue of Trevilley (12 September 1942) and Breedijk (14 September 1942)

Event: On September 12, 1942, Cubango found fifteen survivors from the Trevilley; two days later, it found thirteen survivors from the Breedijk.

Rescue Details: Survivors from both ships were rescued from lifeboats and brought to safety.

Outcome: All rescued were landed safely.

Casualties: Not specified.

Portuguese Fishing Boats (unnamed)

Rescue of HMT Alouette (19 September 1942)

Event: On September 19, 1942, Portuguese fishing boats operating off the coast found and rescued survivors from the British trawler HMT Alouette, sunk by a U-boat.

Rescue Details: The fishermen brought the survivors aboard and took them to the nearest port.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Interesting Note: This rescue is one of the few specifically attributed to the Portuguese fishing fleet, highlighting their role in humanitarian action in the Second World War.

Mouzinho

Rescue of Baron Ogilvy (19 September 1942)

Event: On September 19, 1942, the Mouzinho found survivors from the Baron Ogilvy, a British ship lost in the Atlantic.

Rescue Details: Survivors were brought aboard and landed safely.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Lourenço Marques

Rescue of Cleanthis (30 November 1942)

Event: On November 30, 1942, the Lourenço Marques found survivors from the Greek ship Cleanthis, sunk by belligerent action.

Rescue Details: Survivors were picked up from lifeboats and landed safely.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Luso

Rescue of Medon (10 August 1942)

Event: On August 10, 1942, the Luso found survivors from the Medon, a ship sunk by belligerent action.

Rescue Details: Survivors were rescued and cared for on board.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Key Allied Rescues by Civilian Portuguese Vessels 1943

Portuguese VesselDateRescued Vessel (Nationality)Survivors RescuedCasualties (if known)
Inhambane22-07-1943Harmonic (British)461 (Harmonic) 2
Lourenço Marques11-03-1943Aelybryn (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Sines11-03-1943Keystone (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Foca29-03-1943Moanda (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Albufeira11-04-1943James W. Denver (American)10Not specified 2
(Unspecified)11-05-1943Tinhow (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Luabo17-07-1943City of Canton (British)Not specifiedNot specified 2
Faro Fishing BoatNov 1943USAAF B-24 Liberator (USA)65 (airmen) 2

Inhambane

Rescue of the British Steamer Harmonic (22 July 1943)

Event: On July 22, 1943, the Portuguese merchant steamer Inhambane was returning from Montevideo to Lisbon when, at 7 a.m., it encountered a lifeboat carrying 46 survivors from the British steamship Harmonic, which had been torpedoed by U-172 a week earlier.

Rescue Details: The survivors, led by Captain Roland Stott, had endured days at sea, suffering from thirst and injuries. The Inhambane’s crew provided water, tobacco, clothing, and medical treatment. Recognizing the difficulty of carrying so many extra people to Lisbon, Captain Lourenço Fernandes decided to head for Baía, Brazil. There, on July 24, the survivors were transferred to a British vessel at the port entrance, after arrangements with the British consul.

Outcome: All 46 survivors were safely transferred and cared for. Only one man from Harmonic had died in the initial torpedo explosion.

Interesting Note: The German U-boat commander reportedly offered help to an injured survivor and even apologized for sinking the ship before departing-a rare gesture in the brutal Battle of the Atlantic2.

Lourenço Marques

Rescue of Aelybryn Survivors (11 March 1943)

Event: On March 11, 1943, the Portuguese merchant vessel Lourenço Marques encountered survivors from the British ship Aelybryn, which had been sunk by belligerent action.

Rescue Details: The survivors were found adrift and taken aboard, where they received food, water, and medical attention.

Outcome: Survivors were landed safely and received by local authorities.

Casualties: Not specified.

Sines

Rescue of Keystone Survivors (11 March 1943)

Event: On the same day, March 11, 1943, the Portuguese merchant ship Sines rescued castaways from the Keystone, another vessel lost to wartime action.

Rescue Details: The Sines’s crew brought the survivors aboard and provided immediate care.

Outcome: Survivors were landed safely in Portugal.

Casualties: Not specified.

Foca

Rescue of Moanda Crew (29 March 1943)

Event: On March 29, 1943, the Portuguese ship Foca found and rescued the crew of the Moanda, a vessel lost in the Atlantic.

Rescue Details: Survivors were picked up from lifeboats and cared for on board.

Outcome: Crew landed safely.

Casualties: Not specified.

Albufeira

Rescue of James W. Denver Survivors (11 April 1943)

Event: On April 11, 1943, the Portuguese vessel Albufeira found ten survivors from the American ship James W. Denver.

Rescue Details: The survivors, adrift for days, were rescued and provided with food, water, and medical attention.

Outcome: All ten were landed safely.

Casualties: Not specified.

Unspecified Portuguese Vessels

Rescue of Tinhow Survivors (11 May 1943)

Event: On May 11, 1943, two Portuguese vessels jointly rescued survivors from the Tinhow.

Rescue Details: The survivors were picked up and cared for by the crews of both ships.

Outcome: Survivors landed safely.

Casualties: Not specified.

Luabo

Rescue of City of Canton Survivors (17 July 1943)

Event: On July 17, 1943, the Portuguese vessel Luabo found castaways from the City of Canton.

Rescue Details: Survivors were taken aboard, cared for, and landed safely.

Outcome: Crew saved.

Casualties: Not specified.

Faro Fishing Boat

Rescue of USAAF B-24 Liberator Crew (November 1943)

Event: In late 1943, a USAAF B-24 Liberator crashed off the Algarve coast. Three Faro fishermen-Jaime Nunes, José Mascarenhas, and his teenage son Manuel-rowed through rough seas to rescue six American airmen.

Rescue Details: The fishermen brought the survivors ashore, hid them from authorities, and helped arrange their repatriation.

Outcome: Six airmen survived; five perished in the crash.

Interesting Note: This act of bravery was only publicly recognized decades later, with a memorial in Faro.

Rescues by Civilian Portuguese Vessels 1944

There are no documented rescues at sea by Portuguese merchant or fishing vessels in 1944 (i.e., picking up castaways from torpedoed Allied or Axis ships). The shift in the war meant far fewer sinkings near Portuguese waters, and the focus of Portuguese civilian shipping turned to refugee transport rather than open-sea rescues of shipwrecked sailors.

In 1944, Portuguese merchant ships-especially the liners SS Nyassa and SS Serpa Pinto-continued their vital humanitarian missions, primarily transporting refugees fleeing war-torn Europe. While there are no documented open-sea rescues of torpedoed merchantmen by Portuguese civilian ships in 1944, the year was marked by dramatic and historically significant refugee voyages, and at least one perilous encounter with a German U-boat.

SS Nyassa

Refugee Voyages and Humanitarian Action (1944)

  • January 25, 1944: Nyassa departed Lisbon carrying 172 Jewish refugees, some of whom had been in Portugal since 1933. She then called at Cádiz, Spain, where she embarked another 570 refugees. The voyage continued through the Suez Canal to Portuguese India and returned via Mozambique, repatriating Portuguese civil servants who had been stranded due to the war.
  • Significance: This voyage made Nyassa the first merchant ship to make a commercial passage through the Mediterranean and Suez Canal since Italy entered the war in June 1940.
  • June 1944: Nyassa left Lisbon with 75 refugees and 25 US citizens, reaching Philadelphia after a 17-day crossing on July 8.
  • September 18, 1944: She departed Lisbon with 118 passengers, including 95 refugees, reaching Philadelphia on October 1. Thirteen of these refugees were to join relatives in the US; the rest were bound for Canada.

Interesting Note:
Nyassa’s 1944 voyages reflect Portugal’s ongoing commitment to humanitarian neutrality. The ship’s ability to navigate war zones and deliver hundreds of refugees to safety-despite the risks of submarine warfare-was a remarkable achievement and a lifeline for many5.

SS Serpa Pinto

Refugee Voyages and U-Boat Incident (May 26, 1944)

  • Humanitarian Voyages: Throughout 1944, Serpa Pinto continued to carry refugees from Lisbon and Spanish ports to the Americas, with the support of organizations like the Joint Distribution Committee (JDC). Passenger lists from 1941–1944 show thousands of refugees, including Jews fleeing the Holocaust, diplomats, and other civilians, found safety aboard her6.
  • Dramatic U-Boat Encounter: On May 26, 1944, Serpa Pinto was intercepted in the mid-Atlantic by a German U-boat. The submarine’s captain ordered the ship to stop and forced all passengers and crew into lifeboats, preparing to sink the vessel. After several tense hours, the U-boat commander received orders from Berlin to let Serpa Pinto go, and the refugees and crew were allowed to reboard. The ship continued its voyage, and all aboard survived7.

Interesting Note:
The Serpa Pinto incident became a symbol of the perils faced by neutral humanitarian vessels during the Second World War. Prime Minister Salazar reportedly considered a diplomatic embargo in response, underscoring the gravity of the situation and Portugal’s resolve to protect its ships and humanitarian missions.

Summary Table: Major Portuguese Civilian Ship Humanitarian Missions, 1944

ShipDate(s)Rescue/Mission TypeRefugees/Survivors TransportedCasualties
NyassaJan, Jun, Sep 1944Refugee transport (Lisbon–US/India/etc.)172–570 per voyageNone
Serpa Pinto26-May-1944U-boat interception, refugee transportHundreds per voyageNone

Rescues by Civilian Portuguese Vessels 1945

By 1945, the Battle of the Atlantic had dramatically subsided, and the need for at-sea rescues by Portuguese civilian vessels was nearly nonexistent. The main focus of Portuguese maritime activity shifted toward the return to peacetime operations, with convoys and the “White Fleet” (cod-fishing schooners) continuing their traditional work, but without documented rescues of torpedoed or shipwrecked Allied, Axis, or neutral sailors that year. The last wartime cod-fishing convoy sailed in April 1945, and the threat from U-boats had ended with Germany’s surrender in May.


The SS Nova Scotia Rescue (1942)

Although the NRP Afonso de Albuquerque was a Portuguese Navy ship, I thought the story compelling in what happened during the rescue. The British troop transport Nova Scotia, carrying 1,052 people (including 766 Italian POWs and internees ), was sunk by U-177 off Natal, South Africa. The U-boat was advised not to pick up survivors and the Portuguese in neighboring Lourenço Marques (today’s Maputo, Mozambique) were alerted to the human catastrophe. The Portuguese sloop NRP Afonso de Albuquerque, commanded by Captain José de Brito, located survivors after a 27-hour search. Despite intense rivalry between Allied guards and Italian prisoners on life rafts, the crew rescued 194 people, including a woman who swam alone for 30 hours after losing her daughter. The operation, the largest by a Portuguese ship during the Second World War, highlights both humanitarian commitment and the grim realities of wartime enmity. 4

Portuguese VesselDateRescued Vessel (Nationality)Survivors RescuedCasualties (Rescued Vessel)
NRP Afonso de Albuquerque (Navy sloop)29-Nov-1942Nova Scotia (British troop transport)194 (64 Allies, 130 Italians)858 (212 Allies, 646 Italians)

Bibliography

  1. Portuguese Navy in WWII (Naval Encyclopedia)
  2. Rescues 1939–1941 (Portugal 1939-1945)
  3. Search & Rescue Operations (Portugal 1939-1945)
  4. NRP Afonso de Albuquerque Rescue (Portugal 1939-1945)
  5. Portuguese Navy History (Wikipedia)
  6. JDC Archives

Notes

  • Many rescues lack detailed survivor/vessel names due to incomplete records.
  • Portuguese civilian crews were rarely named in official reports.
  • The Serpa Pinto also transported Jewish refugees to safety, earning the nickname “Ship of Destiny.”

Medalha Comemorativa do Esforço dos Tripulantes da Marinha Mercante Durante a Guerra de 1939-1945 [Commemorative Medal for the Effort of Merchant Marine Crews During the War of 1939-1945]

The Portuguese Merchant Marine commemorative medal from the Second World War employs rich symbolic language that draws from classical antiquity while honoring Portugal’s maritime heritage. The obverse features a striking winged female figure in the tradition of Victoria (Nike), the classical personification of victory. Clothed in flowing robes reminiscent of ancient Greek chiton garments, she stands proudly upon a stylized ship’s prow—a significant detail that anchors her firmly in maritime context while echoing classical victory monuments where Nike was often depicted on the prow of a vessel. This imagery deliberately evokes the Nike of Samothrace, one of the most famous ancient sculptures depicting victory at sea.

The figure holds what appears to be a laurel branch or palm frond extended outward, traditional symbols of triumph, honor, and peace dating back thousands of years. Her posture, with its subtle contrapposto stance, conveys dignity and classical grace, while her expansive wings create a protective embrace that symbolically shelters those who served at sea. These wings serve multiple symbolic functions: they emphasize the divine or elevated nature of national recognition, suggest protection over the sailors, and reference freedom and transcendence over earthly dangers—particularly meaningful for those who faced the perils of war at sea.

Encircling this central figure, the inscription “RECONHECIMENTO DA NAÇÃO” (Recognition from the Nation) employs a formal Roman-inspired typeface that lends governmental authority and connects the medal to traditional European commemorative design. The typography’s precision and placement follow classical medallion conventions, creating a sense of timeless honor rather than merely contemporary recognition.

The reverse side centers on a boldly rendered anchor, the universal symbol of maritime identity and hope. In Portuguese naval tradition, the anchor represents not only the practical tools of seafaring but also steadfastness in the face of adversity—a particularly resonant meaning for merchant sailors facing wartime dangers. This anchor is positioned between the years “1939-1945,” clearly defining the period of service being commemorated while creating visual balance in the composition.

The reverse’s encircling text, “MEDALHA COMEMORATIVA DO ESFORÇO DOS TRIPULANTES DA MARINHA MERCANTE DURANTE A GUERRA DE 1939-1945,” follows the tradition of explanatory text on medal reverses. The consistent typography connects visually to the obverse, creating design unity across both faces of the medal.

The medal’s suspension element features an intricately rendered nautical rope formed into a loop, incorporating maritime craft directly into the functional aspects of the medal rather than using a standard military attachment. This thoughtful detail reinforces Portugal’s deep historical connection to seafaring traditions dating back to the Age of Discovery, when Portuguese navigators first mapped much of the world’s oceans.

Taken as a whole, the medal represents a sophisticated blending of classical allegory with practical maritime symbolism. It effectively communicates that though Portugal maintained official neutrality during the Second World War, the nation recognized that its merchant sailors faced dangers comparable to military combatants. The design choices place this particular service within Portugal’s lengthy maritime heritage while using universal symbols recognized across Western cultural contexts, elevating what might have been a simple service medal into a meaningful artistic commemoration.

U.S. Naval Reserve Insignia reprise

U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Midshipman Identification badge.

U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point, NY.
Circa 2017.
The Eagle Pin.


Midshipmen at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point met the proscription of the U.S. Naval Reserve badge from their uniforms of by the Chief of Naval Operations in June 2011 with mild derision. The Academy administration did not, and quietly resurrected the pin for local use in 2013. For the almost seventy-five year existence of the Regiment of Midshipmen, Kings Pointers pinned the insignia on their uniforms with pride. If no other piece of insignia or decoration adorned midshipmen coats or shirts, the Sea Chicken was present. Its removal echoed a larger narrative of the changing rôle of merchant seamen within the U.S. military establishment and the struggle of the Merchant Marine to remain relevant in an age where Federal maritime policy has been one of neglect. Its reappearance emphasizes its symbolic status and importance within the midshipmen community.

Often a means for military and paramilitary organizations to cultivate group cohesion is through the selective disbursement of insignia among its members. Insignia falls into three broad classes: rank designator, personal award, and unit identifier.  Rank insignia indicates seniority and managerial responsibility within an organization. As one achieves seniority, the uniform is updated with a progression of rank pins; with another stripe or another star comes additional opportunities for command. Badges are awarded for knowledge area expertise; this recognition enables the wearer to feel invested in their rôle. By comparison, unit identifiers embody continuity with the past and promote a mythos of belonging. Thus, a uniform’s accouterments operate as potent coded visual markers and their configuration signal mimetically shared traditions. Through deciphering insignia at salute distance, by those within or trained in the organization’s symbolic language, can one divine a member’s seniority, skill area, and place in the organization’s hierarchy. Among insignia, badges are often more coveted than rank insignia. Badges are objects of prestige for what they represent: a skill, a position of trust, or an achievement. In this light, wearers meet the removal of a badge with some degree of resistance and critique unless done to signify a merit-based change of status. Without group consultation, the act of removal may cultivate ill will.

No discussion of the U.S. Naval Reserve (USNR) badge’s deletion is complete without a sketch of contemporary U.S. Naval culture. The U.S. Navy is compartmentalized and hierarchical in structure. It has aligned its officers into communities. The prestige of attaining rank and qualifications governs these communities. The culture is such that badges represent a passage through a figurative ritual process denoting one’s advancement as a militarized officer. In the specific case of the Surface Warfare Officer (SWO) badge, these rituals include watch standing and mastering damage control. In fact, among the surface officer communities, the award of the badge separates those junior in subject mastery from those who hold advanced, compartmentalized knowledge. In the Surface Supply Corps, if a junior officer does not earn that community’s badge while afloat, they rotate back to shore; this acts as an impetus for the officer to return to the prestige of a ship billet. Moreover, if a junior officer does not earn the SWO badge, they, in turn, do not advance in rank. Since the U.S. Navy has a limited number of billets, failure to advance results in eventual discharge from the service.

The SWO badge has an analog in the enlisted community; it is the Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist (ESWS) badge. The design is similar to the officer’s except it has enlisted cutlasses as opposed to an officer’s swords, and is brushed silver in finish. The prerequisites for earning the enlisted badge are similar to the officer’s badge but dissimilar enough to warrant a separate award. This badge, though, is not the determiner of a sailor’s “fitness”; however, earning it enables an enlisted sailor to advance in rank and opens a hatch for entry into the surface officer community.  Junior commissioned officers seen wearing the silver ESWS badge are members of a small community of “Limited Duty Officers” or ex-enlisted sailors who by virtue of specialized knowledge and ambition are granted entry into the officer corps.  These individuals call themselves “Mustangs.” After completing the requisite – or what they call “Mickey Mouse” – qualifications, they replace the ESWS for the SWO badge. The replacement of the badge is not done grudgingly; Mustangs are keen to take on the mantle of regular officers and undergo the breadth of rituals associated with the prestige of rank. The only obvious markers of their previous status as an enlisted sailor after attaining the SWO badge would be the deep crimson ribbon for “Good Conduct” in their ribbon rack.

Through a confluence of events and tradition of use, the USNR badge mediates a position of both a skill badge and a unit identifier for the Kings Pointer. As I have discussed before, the badge was created expressly to identify members of the newly formulated U.S. Naval Reserve Merchant Marine Reserve. In time, it was adopted by cadets of the U.S. Maritime Commission and awarded to cadet-midshipmen at state maritime academies (CFR 1941 Title 46 §293.16 “they shall wear such Naval Reserve insignia”). Despite Kings Pointers sharing a similar uniform and speaking the same military vocabulary as their colleagues at the U.S. Naval Academy, the badge became an integral identifier of Kings Pointers and marked them apart. Since the badge was an official U.S. Navy decoration, and since Kings Pointers wore the badge past graduation aboard U.S. Navy ships and auxiliary vessels, it identified them as maritime professionals serving with the U.S. Navy. In this discrete definition, the badge spoke to their community and unique skill-set from the moment they entered the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point. Thus, like Mustangs and their silver ESWS badge, the USNR badge denotes membership in a small group of mariners within the ranks of the U.S. Navy officer community. It specifies Naval Officers who completed various prerequisites and swore an oath, at one time or another, as members of the Merchant Marine Reserve (USNR/MMR).

It is worth mentioning that the USNR badge was deleted from the Kings Point midshipman uniform once before during a stretch from 1956 to 1964. Congressional and U.S. Navy oversight legislated away the status of U.S. Navy Midshipman Reserve for the Kings Pointer; this was due to ending the Merchant Marine Reserve Program. The U.S. Merchant Marine Academy and its allies argument for the reinstatement of the program was that many students enrolled at the Academy for the opportunity to become licensed officers of the U.S. Merchant Marine and for the prestige of joining the U.S. Armed Services as a commissioned officer. Conventional wisdom at the time held, if they wished to simply sail, they could go to a state maritime school. After Congress addressed the oversight and reestablished the program, Kings Pointers reclaimed the title of midshipmen and donned the pin once again.

Popular backlash from the Vietnam War resulted in problems for the U.S. Armed Services to attract recruits after the cessation of hostilities. This, coupled with former volunteers leaving the military in droves, resulted in too many vacancies and a weakened threat response by the military. The U.S. Navy, long a proponent of bifurcation of Active duty and Reserve personnel, found this segregation counter-intuitive for maintaining a ready force and wasteful of resources. Thus, under Admiral Zumwalt, it re-organized its personnel system and abolished both the formal and informal barriers between “regular” and “reserve” officers.  Among those in the latter class were U.S. Merchant Marine Academy graduates.  As a means of identifying Merchant Marine Reserve Officers who took active commissions, and indicating their important contribution to the mission of U.S. Navy, in 1978 the Bureau of Personnel wrote into regulation the ability to wear the USNR badge on the uniforms of active duty officers. This reversed an explicit 45-year prohibition of its wear and gave a long overdue nod to maritime professionals who chose to “Go Navy.” This symbol of status and prestige remained unchanged until 2011.

During early 2011, the U.S. Navy underwent another personnel realignment and rewrote the specifications for its various officer communities. Among those programs written out of existence was the U.S. Naval Reserve/Merchant Marine Reserve (USNR/MMR). Despite their military education component falling under the auspices of the U.S. Navy Education Command, Kings Pointers remained in the U.S. Naval Reserve, but MMR became a component of the Strategic Sealift Officer (SSO) community. Strictly speaking, the USNR badge represented the identification of a class of individuals who no longer existed within the U.S. Navy. A press release from the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations states:

Extensive coordination with several Navy organizations and the U.S. Maritime Administration helped with the program change.

The SSOP [Strategic Sealift Officer Program] supports national defense sealift requirements and capabilities, which are executed by Military Sealift Command (MSC). The program provides the Navy with officers that possess sealift, maritime operations, and logistics subject matter expertise, and further hold U.S. Coast Guard credentials as Merchant Marine officers.

“These changes will help align and improve support to Military Sealift Command and numerous other Joint and Navy commands,” said Vice Adm. Bill Burke, Deputy CNO for Fleet Readiness and Logistics, who is the SSOP program sponsor. “This revision improves stewardship, integration, and opportunities for about 2,400 Navy Reserve officers.”

The SSOP, like the old MMR Program, will continue to provide the capability for emergency crewing of sealift ships and shoreside support to Navy commands that require unique maritime expertise. Further, this change provides opportunities for greater operational support to the Navy by expanding selected Reserve (SELRES) billets and active duty recalls to SSOP officers. (Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. “Merchant Marine Reserve Program becomes Strategic Sealift Officer Program” NNS110616-16 Release Date: 6/16/2011.)

The new program brought with it a new badge and provisions to earn it. Unlike the USNR badge, a midshipman could not earn the SSWO badge by pledging an oath, as done when formally entering the USNR/MMR; in fact, the initial CNO communication explicitly mentioned midshipmen (at Kings Point and the State Maritime Academies) were not authorized to wear the new badge. This singled-out of Kings Pointers and rubbed a bit of salt in the wound since earning this new badge was unattainable for the duration of a midshipman’s tenure at the Academy. In an ironic twist, the new badge’s design gives a nod to its historical roots – it keeps the “eagle from the USS Constitution’s stern” and places over it crossed U.S Navy officer swords behind a Federal U.S. shield surcharged with “a fouled anchor from the U.S. Merchant Marine flag” (U.S. Navy Uniform Regulations NAVPERS 15665I, 5201.2.bbb). The last design note is deemed particularly insensitive by some Kings Point alumni since one of the few locations that fly U.S. Merchant Marine flags is Kings Point. As a matter of course, the Strategic Sealift Officer program only mans Military Sealift Command ships – thus only mariners attached to MSC will ever earn the badge; in essence, the SSWO badge very clearly pigeonholes maritime school graduates as being merchant mariners in the U.S. Navy. Whereas the USNR badge was more democratic in its wear; Kings Point midshipmen and graduates wore it while attached to any of the U.S. Navy’s activities and not just the MSC.

Nevertheless, with the change, the Kings Point class of 2013, became the last Kings Pointers to wear the USNR badge. Upon graduation, those who took oaths as commissioned officers in the U.S. Navy removed the USNR badge, and due to permutations of administrative procedures, could immediately wear the new SSWO badge. The class of 2014 and all those that followed did not have this opportunity. Unless the Academy took action, incoming U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Plebe candidates would find themselves without the once proud symbol of their Federal service status and obligation on Acceptance Day; as mentioned before, the badge awarding ceremony is the first ritual Kings Point midshipmen participate in at the Academy.

The U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Commandant, under the provisions of U.S. Code (CFR 2006 Title 46 §51308.1), could prescribe the wear and standards of uniforms at the Academy. Under this umbrella, he granted the Regiment of Midshipmen their distinctive uniforms and ability to wear pieces of insignia and awards specific to the Academy. With word of the deletion of the old badge, the Academy administration was quick to act, and after consultation with the insignia manufacturer, Vanguard Industries, they came up with a redesign of the traditional badge and new name. Vanguard first manufactured the badge on July 11, 2013; afterward, the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Ship’s Store stocked the item as “MM BDG MIDSHIP ID GLD” – U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Midshipman Identification Badge in Gold.

The Ship’s Store initially ordered 900 units of the new badge. On the same Purchase Order was a $500 tooling fee for the new die. Kings Point, in effect, now owns a key component of their identity. The badge is a Kings Point-only uniform item. It is similar to the old USNR badge with the exception that four stars replaced the letters U S N R on the scroll beneath the eagle. When in uniform, Kings Pointers at the Academy will continue to look as they have for decades, thus keeping visual continuity and cultivating an esprit de corps. They call it simply: “The Eagle Pin.”

On graduation day, when Kings Pointers become active-duty commissioned officers or join the ranks of those in reserve, they will continue to remove the re-designed USNR badge. Within the U.S. Navy, their unique identity is no longer as markedly visible as before. Since a Kings Pointer is thrifty to a fault, they will reuse their old uniforms, and they will be distinctive by the shadow of two pinholes on their khaki shirts and Service Dress blues. Time will tell whether or not the U.S. Navy will re-establish the oldest of its badges. Until then, Kings Pointers will work for their sanctioned pins and place them over the outline of their first.

Special thanks are owed to the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Alumni Association and Foundation in granting me access to their trove of old yearbooks and for publishing my previous article on the subject; the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Ship’s Store for answering my queries about the badge; Vanguard Industries for furnishing me with production dates of “The Eagle Pin”; and many others who endured my inane questions about what the old badge meant to them. Thank you all.


Note

The naming convention for the USNR badge has changed over time. In the 1930s documentation refers to it as a USNR insigne and during the Cold War, it became a USNR badge. In colloquial speech, it is today called a USNR pin. I use badge as this is the term commonly used by archivists and collectors in both the United States and British Commonwealth. Insigne (an outmoded term for a single piece of insignia), insignia, badge, and pin nomenclature holds in any discussion of U.S. Naval uniform insignia.


U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Midshipman Identification Badge in Gold.
U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point, NY.
Single piece, solid construction.
Hallmark, V-21-N (Vanguard Industries)
Circa 2017.


Despite some talk that the badge has a variant with no stars, the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Ship’s Store staff (the sole distributor of the badge) and Vanguard Industries (the sole manufacturer of the badge) have communicated to me that there is no such variant.


Strategic Sealift Officer Warfare badge.
U.S. Navy.
Two piece construction; punched anchor device.
Hallmark, V-21-N (Vanguard Industries)
Circa 2017.



U.S. Naval Merchant Marine Reserve insignia (miniature).
U.S. Navy.
Single piece, solid construction.
Eagle stamped sterling silver with gold-plate.
Hallmark, Vanguard N.Y.
Circa 1943.



Surface Warfare Office badge.
U.S. Navy.
Single piece, solid construction.
Hallmark, V-21-N (Vanguard Industries)
Circa 2017.


Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist badge.
U.S. Navy
Single piece, hollow construction.
Hallmark, V-21-N (Vanguard Industries)
Circa 1979. The badge is pinned above the ribbon rack on a Zummy uniform reefer.

The U.S. Navy sometimes errs in re-writing uniform regulations. Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, Jr., the Chief of Naval Operations, wished to “humanize a service soured by the war in Vietnam” and ordered a drastic change in the uniform for enlisted sailors in 1971. Out were the bell-bottom trousers, buttonless jumpers, black silk four-in-hands tie, and white Bob Evans sailor’s caps. They were replaced with military shirts, straight-legged trousers, pewter-buttoned reefers, neckties, and combination hats. The enlisted sailor became almost indistinguishable in appearance from officers and chief petty officers. This order became mandatory in 1973 when morale in the U.S. Navy was at a low. The thought was if enlisted sailors felt they looked professional, they would take more pride in the service.

However, the changes Admiral Zumwalt initiated resulted in the opposite. Reportedly, the change in uniform caused a problem in morale among career petty officers; they complained loudly that discipline suffered and sailors wanted their crackerjacks back. On August 1, 1977, the Secretary of the Navy John Lehman, supported CNO Admiral James L. Holloway III’s order to return to the old uniform. In classic U.S. Navy style there was a year-long evaluation period before the release of “BuPers Notice 1020 of 22 March 1978” allowing for jumper-style uniform purchase by those testing the new uniform.  In July of the same year, U.S. Navy Uniform Regulations, 1978 came out permitting the rest of the fleet Seamen to Petty Officers Second Class the same. By 1984, The service collectively breathed a sigh of relief when the “Zummy uniform” finally was out for all.

But, the uniforms were not retired soon enough for the ESWS badge to be pinned on the above reefer.


Surface Warfare Officer (top) & Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist badge (bottom)  (subdued).
U.S. Navy
Single piece, solid construction.
Hallmark, V-21-N (Vanguard Industries)
Circa 2017.


Both the officer and enlisted badges have subdued versions for wear in joint combat operations or attached to Fleet Marine Forces, in brown and black metal, respectively. In the U.S. Navy, rank insignia and the SWO/ESWS badge, gold becomes brown and silver black when subdued.


Surface Warfare Officer (top) & Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist badge (bottom)  (subdued) – reverse.



References

Coming Soon… The New Uniforms.All Hands. 675 (April 1973), p 3-7.

Jumper Style Uniform Guidance Provided.All Hands. 736 (May 1978), p 3.

Traditional Uniform Returns to Navy.All Hands. 737 (June 1978), p 4.

James C. Bradford. America, Sea Power, and the World. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. see “Z-grams: Zumwalt’s Reforms” p 308

The New York Times & Clyde Haberman. “August 2, 1977: Navy Reviving Bell-Bottoms” in New York Times The Times of the Seventies: The Culture, Politics, and Personalities that Shaped the Decade. Running Press, Nov 12, 2013.

Rogers Worthington “Saluting A Return To Navy Tradition: To Rebellion And Back In A Decade.Chicago Tribune, July 05, 1986.

Thomas H. Lee, Jr. “Blue Navy.The Harvard Crimson, December 7, 1972.

United States. Bureau of Naval Personnel. U.S. Navy Uniform Regulations, 1978. Department of Defense, Navy Department, Bureau of Naval Personnel, 1979.

United States. Bureau of Naval Personnel. United States Navy Uniform Regulations, 1985. Department of Defense, Navy Department, Bureau of Naval Personnel, 1985.

United States. Bureau of Naval Personnel. U.S. Navy Uniform Regulations NAVPERS 15665I.  Department of Defense, Navy Department, Bureau of Naval Personnel, 2013.

United States. Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. “Merchant Marine Reserve Program becomes Strategic Sealift Officer Program” NNS110616-16 Release Date: 6/16/2011.

United States. Code of Federal Regulations of the United States of America 1941 Supplement Titles 46-50. National Archives, Washington D.C., 1943.

U.S. Naval Reserve Insignia

U.S. Naval Merchant Marine Reserve insignia.
Single construction.
Eagle stamped brass with gold-plate.
1939-1940.
badge: 2-3/4in from tip to tip of wings.

 


In October 1942, a curious chain of memoranda was passed between the New York State Maritime Academy Superintendent and various U.S. Navy officials. Prompted by Kings Point cadet uniforms having sewn on them a previously professional only device in preparation for a parade on the 24th of the month, the NYSMA Superintendent had a valid question, and perhaps potentially a little egg-on-face for his counterpart across Long Island Sound. The notes touched on the eligibility of cadets at the aforementioned academy to wear a relatively recent badge: the U.S. Naval Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia. This insignia came to be called the U.S. Naval Reserve Insignia, or simply the Sea Chicken.


(580) Dy
October 14, 1942

From: The Superintendent, New York State Maritime
Academy.
To: The Chief of Naval Personnel.
Via: The Commandant, Third Naval District.
Subject: Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia.
Wear On Academy Uniform.
Reference: (a) Art. 16-9 of Chapter XVI of U.S. Navy
Uniform Regulations, 1941.

1. Information is requested whether the insignia
described in reference (a) is authorized to be worn on
the dress uniform of cadets enrolled in this academy who
hold appointments as Midshipmen in the Merchant Marine
Reserve, U.S. Naval Reserve, and who do not hold licenses
issued by Marine Inspection Service.

/s/ Thos. T. Craven.
[Vice Admiral T. T. Craven, U.S.N.]

1st endorsemnet
JJ55-3
DMq09:cs

19 October 1942.

From: The Commandant, Third Naval District.
To: The Chief of Naval Personnel.

1. Forwarded.
2. The Commandant considers that the Merchant Marine
Reserve insignia is intended to give recognition to
merchant marine officers employed by private companies
who are members of the Naval Reserve, and, therefore,
does not recommend that cadets enrolled in the New
York State Maritime Academy be authorized to wear this
insignia.

/s/ Paul P. Blackburn,
By direction.

26 October 1942
Pers-1016--KS
JJ55-3(1522)

From: The Chief of Naval Personnel.
To: The Superintendent,
New York State Maritime Academy,
Fort Schuyler, The Bronx, N.Y.
Via: The Commandant Third Naval District.
Subject: Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia - to be
worn by midshipmen, Merchant Marine
Reserve.
References: (a) Supt. N.Y.St.Mar.Acs.ltr (580)Dy
of Oct. 14, 1942.
(b) Art. 16-9, Uniform Regulations,
U.S. Navy.
Enclosure: (A) Copy of BuNav ltr. Nav-1644-XKS
(QR2(C)(66) of Oct. 4, 1941.

1. As midshipmen, Merchant Marine Reserve, at the State
Maritime Academies are required to wear a uniform
appropriate to an officer, and as these Academies are
under the supervision of the War Shipping Administration,
which succeeded to the training functions formerly
performed by the U.S. Maritime Commission, midshipmen,
Merchant Marine Reserve, under instruction at these
Academies, are authorized to wear the Merchant Marine
Reserve insignia on their Academy uniforms.

/s/ L. E. Denfield,
The Assistant Chief of Naval Personnel.

Apparently, the Maritime Academies had a friend in the Chief of Naval Personnel, as in 1942 the matter was settled in that all cadets may indeed wear the insignia. All of this begs the question: what was this insignia, that caused such a stir of interest among Naval and Maritime Academy officials?

The Merchant Marine Reserve had its beginnings in 1913 when US Congress wrote into law a reformulated the Naval Reserve Force. At the time, the Reserve was separated into five classes, and soon became six:

Class I: The Fleet Naval Reserve:  Consisting of personnel having former active Naval Service.

Class II: The Naval Reserve:  Consisting of persons of the seagoing profession who had served at least two years aboard a vessel on the high seas or larger lakes.

Class III: Naval Auxiliary Reserve: Consisting of persons who had served or were serving in the Merchant Marine of the United States.

Class IV:  Naval Coast Defense Reserve:  Consisting of personnel capable of performing special and useful service in the time of war.

Class V:  Volunteer Naval Reserve:  Consisting of personnel qualifying for the other classes of the Reserve, who were willing to serve without pay in the time of peace.

Class VI:  Naval Reserve Flying Corps:  Consisting of personnel who were from the Naval Flying Corps.

Class III, Naval Auxiliary Reserve, comprised of officers and unlicensed seamen, was the precursor of the Merchant Marine Reserve program, and the one for which the U.S. Naval Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia would ultimately be destined.

Insignia for the Reserve was first prescribed in “Changes in Uniform Regulations United State Navy, 1913 No. 10” in 1915. This was the first official publication of distinctive uniform elements for the entire Naval Reserve. At the time, those Merchant Marine Officers in Class III wore their steamship line or company uniform with the Naval Reserve Force device on the collar of the “military coat,” or on the lapels of the “box coat.”  This device was a miniature of the commissioned officers cap device. There were also special buttons worn on Merchant Marine uniforms. The button field was plain, with an anchor and the letters “U.S.” on either side of the shackle above the stock, and with the letters “N.R.” on either side of the shank between the stock and the flukes.

On June 25, 1938, the Naval Reserve Force underwent a name change to become simply the Naval Reserve. The classes were reduced to three with the original Naval Auxiliary Reserve renamed the U.S. Naval Merchant Marine Reserve, and still remaining the class III program. The “Naval Reserve (Merchant Marine) Insignia, Special Distinguishing Insignia for certain licensed officers” as it was first known and later called the “breast insignia of the Merchant Marine Reserve, U.S. Naval Reserve (Eagle and Scroll badge)”, was approved for wear on Merchant Marine uniforms on April 7, 1938, by then Secretary of the Navy, Claude A. Swanson. This insignia replaced the miniature cap device and buttons originally approved for the Naval Auxiliary Reserve. The authorization for the aforementioned insignia was the Merchant Marine Act of 1936, in which it was stated: “Licensed Officers who are members of the United States Naval Reserve shall wear on their uniforms such special distinguishing insignia as may be approved by the Secretary of the Navy.”  The 1936 Act was based on the earlier Shipping Act of 1916 that required officers serving on vessels receiving a Federal government operating subsidy to be, if eligible, members of the United States Naval Reserve. Other Naval Reserve officers serving in merchant ships in positions that required them to wear “a uniform appropriate to an officer,” were authorized to wear the insignia. The insignia was emphatically not authorized to be worn with the naval uniform. Moreover, enlisted men of the Naval Reserve were not permitted to wear the Merchant Marine Reserve insignia.

As authorized in 1938, the Merchant Marine Reserve insignia was composed of a gold embroidered bronze or gold plated metal pin consisting of a spread eagle surcharged with crossed anchors and shield 5/8in in height, 2-3/4in from tip to tip of wings; length of anchors 7/8in; and underset with 3/16 scroll bearing the letters “US” on one side of the shield and “NR” on the opposite side. Wearers were required to wear the Merchant Marine Reserve insignia on the left breast of their Merchant Marine uniform and nowhere else.

The eagle design is based on the original eagle carved into the stern of the USS Constitution. The scroll pattern was often found on the stern of ships and contained the ships’ names. The shield has 13 stars and stripes with crossed anchors taken from the then current US Navy officer’s cap device and recalling the original Naval Auxiliary Reserve insignia. Following the design of the cap device, the original insignia design had the eagle looking to its own left. In 1941, Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox prescribed a change wherein all Navy insignia bearing eagles were henceforth to have the heads facing their own right. According to heraldic law, the right side (dexter) of the shield is the honor side, and the left side (sinister) indicated dishonor or illegitimacy. The suggestion also has been made that the change was to have the eagle look toward the olive branches on the left side and peace as appears on the Great Seal of the United States, rather than the warlike arrows to the right. More information may be found here.

The 1930s was a turbulent time. The U.S. shipping industry was in free fall due to the Great Depression, with foreign firms having taken over most overseas and making strident end-runs in domestic shipping. As war erupted across Europe and Asia, the belligerent nations, which once carried the majority of U.S. trade, swept their ships into national service, leaving the U.S. both lacking in both ships and men. The Federal government stepped into the fray by subsidizing ship construction and encouraging the training of young men to enter the trade, and the U.S. Navy found itself looking for warm bodies to man its ships in the eventuality of war in Europe and in the Pacific. Naturally, the U.S. Navy looked to Nautical Schools and Merchant Marine Academies for potential manpower. Nevertheless, manpower could only be had with concessions from both sides: military and civilian.

At the invitation of the Navy Department, an informal conference of the governing bodies and Superintendents of the State nautical schools was held in Washington from April 12-14, 1938. The conference was attended by representatives from the then four State schools: New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and California. The object of the conference was to bring about a closer cooperation between the Navy Department and the State nautical schools; also to coordinate the work of the four schoolships. The end goal was to create a professional class of ship officers both adequately trained for the rapidly modernizing maritime industry and serve as potential U.S. Navy officers. Never before had a closer relationship between the two been groups been attempted.

Captain Felix X. Gygax, U.S.N., Director of the Naval Reserve, in the Bureau of Navigation, presided over the conference. The opening addresses at the conference were made by Captain Chester W. Nimitz, U.S.N., Assistant Chief of the Bureau of Navigation, Navy Department, and Captain Gygax. In referring to the State nautical schools, Captain Gygax said:

The Navy Department acknowledges and commends the splendid results that have been achieved, as attested by the fine record of the graduates of these nautical schools at sea, and the success of many more in positions of high trust and responsibility in connection with the administration and operation of the maritime industry ashore.

The conference resulted in the following: First, the curricula of the State nautical schools were extended with schools preparing young men not only for service in the American Merchant Marine but also in the United States Naval Reserve. The following nine naval subjects were added to the course of study: Navy Regulations, Naval Law, International Law, Types and Characteristics of Naval ships and aircraft, Tactics and Manoeuvering, Ship Drills, Gunnery, Communications and Damage Control. The instruction in these subjects was to be given the form of lectures by commissioned and active duty Naval officers. Second, the Bureau of Navigation, under the authority of the Secretary of the Navy, issued instructions to local Naval District Commandants providing for the admission of nautical school students in the Naval Reserve as Merchant Marine Cadets, in accordance with the Naval Reserve Act, approved June 25, 1938. Third, the Chief of Bureau of Navigation and the Chief of Naval Operations recommended to the Secretary of the Navy that appropriate steps be taken to secure from the Maritime Commission the allocation of funds for the construction of suitable vessels as replacements for the then present State schoolships, as necessary; these ships were to be of such a character as to be readily usable as naval auxiliaries in an emergency. The recommendation was immediately approved by the Secretary of the Navy. Thus was the inception of the Merchant Marine Midshipman Reserve program which provided the beginnings of Naval Science Program at the Maritime Academies. The New York State Maritime Academy was the first of the schools to open its doors to Naval instructors in 1939; by the end of the year, a big gun found its way to Fort Schuyler.

NYSMA cadets marching at World’s Fair 1939.

Soon thereafter, with the storm clouds of war looming over the Atlantic, civilian instructors the Nautical Schools joined the Merchant Marine Reserve and sewed the new insignia on their reefer jackets. By 1940 the criteria for valid wearers of the insignia was broadened to include staff officers licensed under the Bureau of Marine Inspection and serving on ships with certificated of registry issued by the Secretary of Commerce under contract with the Maritime Commission. That same year, Merchant Marine officers employed by or under the supervision of the U.S. Maritime Commission and enlisted members of the Naval Reserve who were actually licensed and serving as licensed officers were authorized to wear the insignia. And other Naval Reserve Officers serving on merchant ships or under the supervision of the United States Maritime Commission were authorized to wear it; with the same stipulation that it not be worn on the Navy uniform.

On the coattails of the limited National Emergency of September 8, 1939, Roosevelt declared a National Emergency on June 27, 1940; and finally an Unlimited National Emergency on May 27, 1941. The first declaration brought with it the activation of the Naval Fleet Reserve; the last, all members of the Naval Reserve not in deferred status were called to active duty. Members of the Merchant Marine Reserve immediately found themselves in reserve officer status if on requisitioned ships between the former and later declarations as per the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 Title III Section 302(g). Along with them, on October 5, 1940, cadets of the Maritime Commission aboard these ships were placed on active duty as Midshipmen, Merchant Marine Reserve due to previous Maritime Commission and Navy interagency agreements. By early 1942:

[…]There were 60 cadets serving as Midshipman, Merchant Marine Reserve, on active duty on Merchant Marine vessels taken over by the Navy.

The school ships of the state maritime academies were not taken out of auxiliary status and activated; thus, students and non-Naval Reserve instructors remained unaffected. At the same time, with the allocation of government funds and provision of schoolships, schools (now academies) had their training programs vetted by the Maritime Commission. However, these same instructors became inducted into the Maritime Commission’s uniformed training organization – the Maritime Service. With the final action, came membership in the Merchant Marine Reserve. After the formal declaration of war on December 8, 1941:

The Supervisor,  three Assistant Supervisors, the three District Cadet Training Instructors, the three Commanding Officers of Cadet Schools, and almost all Cadet Training Instructors in districts and at Cadet Schools hold licenses as officers of the Merchant Marine, and commissions in the United States Naval Reserve.  On January 6, 1942, the Navy ordered these Naval Reserve officer instructors to active duty status.

It may be due to creative thinking by a Navy supply officer, a Maritime Commission purser or New York uniform supply house salesman, but Corps of Cadets members began to sporadically wear the insignia in 1940.  This would be due to a perceived de facto, and not codified de jure reserve status of the cadets and cadets holding a nominal officer status.  Ship officers, as defined by U.S. law, are those sailing under or holding a license as issued by the US Bureau of Marine Inspection.  Nautical tradition held that cadets were officers-in-training with rank below the lowest officer grade but rating privileges held by a mid-level unlicensed mariner.  Some shipboard cadets, known as “cadet officers”, previously held licenses but did not sail under them, and could conceivably claim  Merchant Marine Reserve status.  Others cadets perhaps (and did) don the insignia while on ships activated during the first emergency periods.  Either way, on paper this insignia was only valid while in active employ aboard merchant vessels.  If a ship were seized directly by the Navy, cadets became midshipmen – as happened to some merchantmen namely oilers and Maritime Commission designed freighters – and were officially barred from wearing the insignia on their uniforms aboard ship.  Moreover, the regulations did not state that the insignia was not for midshipmen, rather licensed officers.

It is worth mentioning that the personnel of the Merchant Marine, Government Marine (e.g. Army Transport Service and Coast and Geodetic Survey) and Armed Marine (US Navy and Coast Guard) shared similar trades, but diverged in organizational culture. The Merchant Marine sailor of the late 1930s suffered through the deprivations of the Great Depression and union struggles against shipowners. Except for ship officers, many held no particular allegiance to ship or employer. With the Jones Act, foreign colleagues were ejected from vessels, thereby removing skilled labor, and introducing gaps in overall ship manning. Depending on the union, mariners could be militantly left-leaning or thoroughly apathetic in their daily struggle to make a living. The Navy rank and file also came from the same lower-middle-class background as the merchant sailors – although tempered by grueling training and autocratic hierarchy. Men in the Regular Navy took a dim view of civilians and reservists on shore and in their midst. Many officers of the former worked their way from the deck to the pilothouse; a small number came from the nautical schools and academies. Most active Navy officers came from the Naval Academy where they were molded and inducted into an efficient warrior class. It is at this intersection where academy graduates and the service found themselves: outsiders making an entrance into an unforgiving hierarchy bound by custom and regulation. It is no surprise that despite coexisting on the same waterfronts, the two groups held each other at arm’s length.

Nevertheless, only after the formal granting of Midshipman, Merchant Marine Reserve status to all cadets in state and federal maritime academies in August 1942 – some months after the move of the East Coast Corps of Cadets from Fort Schuyler to their permanent home at Kings Point – did the mass distribution of the insignia to all Corps of Cadets members occur. This was done by the administrators of the Merchant Marine Academies, not the Navy. Absent is period documentation indicating Navy complicity. However, the insignia was only granted after a cadet completed preliminary training in basic Navy Science and swearing an oath. This oath was not compulsory but was done by all cadets. In fact, the Maritime Commission distributed a pamphlet depicting the insignia as an award granted cadets: “U.S. Naval Reserve Insignia Worn by Cadets of U. S. Maritime Commission and Officers of Merchant Marine Enrolled in Naval Reserve.”  Interestingly, at the time of press in early 1942, cadets were not yet called cadet-midshipmen.

State maritime academy cadets did not wear the insignia at any point up to October 1942; graduating class photos attest to this fact. The lack of insignia would not be due to the absence of a Naval Science curriculum; a course of study created by a gentlemen’s agreement in 1938, and put into practice in 1939 – which coincidentally was the same year that the Corps of Cadets was invited to the NYSMA grounds by then Superintendent Tomb. Nor did not having Midshipmen, Reserve status; which state cadets were afforded in August 1942. Nor even lack of connection to the Maritime Commission; with accepting federal monies and federal ships with which came Federal curricula and staff. It would be due to a creative reading of provisions of wear of the Merchant Marine Reserve insignia did the Corps of Cadets come to wear the insignia; and a rather conservative reading that state cadets did not. It is notable in that the wide-spread distribution of the insignia to cadets only came with Tomb coming to Kings Point a month after its inception as the first superintendent in April 1942.

Kings Point, from its outset, was linked strongly to NYSMA, although both diverged in raison d’être. The NYSMA was created to educate young men from New York for the maritime industry operating out of the Port of New York. The Maritime Commission Corps of Cadets, to bring young men from around the country without access to state schools, the opportunity to become licensed officers of the subsidized blue-water U.S. Merchant Marine. Thus, having looked at the successful model of staffing, cadet structure and uniforming, the early Merchant Marine Academy had similar components as the NYSMA. There was a strong cross-pollination of Kings Point and NYSMA instructors and potential students, Kings Point copying NYSMA regimental and honor system and using practically the same uniforms. At the permanent establishment of the NYSMA at Fort Schuyler, Tomb hailed the facility as being the future Annapolis of the U.S. Merchant Marine; after his transfer to Kings Point, he hailed the Merchant Marine Academy as the same. As such, there existed a friendly rivalry between the two. The mass distribution of the badge, and with it, a perceived honor status, can be viewed as a slight affront to – perhaps even antagonizing – the older school. NYSMA was hampered by New York bureaucracy and its expansion plans stymied by Federal land use provisos and local political posturing.  In this light, the Superintendent’s letter makes sense; as does that of the Commandant, Third Naval District. In essence, if the upstart institution may have the insignia, then so should NYSMA – or vice-versa. Whatever the case may be, all maritime academies, having their cadets subject to Midshipmen, Reserve status and the blessing of the Chief of Naval Personnel secured the insignia on October 26, 1942 – but not in time for the big New York Navy Day parade just two days prior. Thus, as an administrative matter in 1942, the Chief of Naval Personnel authorized Merchant Marine Midshipmen, USNR, under instruction at the state maritime academies, to wear the Merchant Marine Insignia on their academy uniforms, since these academies were under the supervision of the War Shipping Administration.

Post-war saw a change in the military establishment’s view of the role of the Merchant Marine as an auxiliary and the desirability of Merchant Mariners in its reserves. In 1951, the Navy regulations were revised, and only cadets who were Midshipmen, USNR, at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy were allowed to wear the insignia on their academy uniforms – not on their uniforms if shipping out or serving on commissioned Naval vessels. With the 1952 abolition of the Merchant Marine Reserve under Public Law 467 by the 82nd Congress, came the resultant removing Midshipman, USNR status from Merchant Marine Academy cadets and therefore the eligibility of wearing the Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia. Despite being granted Federal status, having a military character and Naval Science courses, Merchant Marine Academy cadets became simply “officer candidates.”   This touched off a controversy in that one of the selling points in a Merchant Marine Academy (state or Federal) education were draft-deferment or exemption and the possibility to be granted a commission in the U.S. Navy upon graduation. Gone was the pin, escape clause, and privileges. However, due to an administrative oversight, cadets continued wearing the badge until mid-1954 with its overall disappearance on cadet uniforms in 1956. Apparently, the California Maritime Academy administration must not have gotten the memo, as in 1958, 18 of 50 graduates were sporting the insignia; in 1959, however, the insignia was absent. 1964 saw with the re-institution of the merchant marine naval reserve status at Kings Point; only to have it abolished in 1965 and superseded by a Naval Reserve commission for the class of 1968 with accompanying badge reappearance.

The state academies had to wait until 1977 when their cadets became Midshipmen, USNR, of the Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) to pin the insignia back on their uniforms. Beginning in 1980, those cadets who signed a Training and Service Agreement and became Midshipmen, USNR, were also authorized to wear the Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia. Up until recently, all Midshipmen USNR enrolled in maritime training programs leading to a merchant marine license, were eligible to wear the insignia.

With the start of the Merchant Marine Reserve, U.S. Naval Reserve (MMR, USNR) program in 1977, the insignia was authorized for the first time for wear on the Navy uniform of officers by this officer community. The requirement for wear was published in the 1978 Navy Uniform Regulations:

To be eligible to wear this insignia, Naval Reservists must meet one of the following requirements:

a.  Be licensed merchant marine officers who sail on their license at least four months every two years and are members of the MMR , USNR program.
b.  Be officers in the Maritime Service holding merchant marine licenses and who are instructors at Federal, State and Regional Academies, and at industry, or union maritime schools who are members of the MMR, USNR, program.
c.  Be merchant marine officers holding licenses as Chief Mate/First Assistant Engineer/Radio Officer or higher, with eight years of licensed sailing experience and currently employed in a maritime related position ashore, and who are members of the MMR, USNR program.

On June 10, 2011, a change in the Merchant Marine, U.S. Naval Reserve program resulted in it being called the Strategic Sealift Officer program, and along with it a replacement of insignia (OPNAVINST 1534.1D § 12.b.5). The new device, Strategic Sealift Officer Warfare Insignia, will be available in May 2012. Despite patterns yet to be struck:

The SSOWI is approved for wear by officers who have successfully completed the qualification requirements outlined in OPNAVINST 1534.1D. The insignia is gold in color and is two and three-quarter inches by seven eighths of an inch in dimension, reflecting the background of an eagle from the USS Constitution’s stern, crossed naval officer swords and a U.S. shield with fouled anchor from the U.S. Merchant Marine flag. The SSOWI will be available in two sizes (normal and miniature). The normal size SSOWI shall be worn on all uniforms, less dinner dress. The miniature SSOWI shall be worn with miniature medals on dinner dress uniforms (NAVADMIN 164/12 § 2.B).

Good to know, I guess.  To the way of the shadow box and collector the illustrious “Sea Chicken” – once symbol of the larger debate of how Merchant Mariners figure in U.S. National Defense – shall go.

References
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Education.  Public Document 42:  III Annual Report of the Commissioners of the Massachusetts Nautical School for the Year Ending November 30, 1938.  Boston:  Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1938.

U.S. Congress.  Naval auxiliaries for use in the Merchant marine. Hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Naval Affairs, House of Representatives, Sixty-third Congress, second session, on S. 5259, a bill to establish one or more United States Navy mail lines between the United States, South America, and Europe; and H.R. 5980, a bill to authorize the President of the United States to build or acquire steamships for use as naval auxiliaries and transports, and to arrange for the use of these ships when not needed for such service, and to make an appropriation therefor.  Washington D.C.: GPO, August 1914.

Department of the Navy. “STRATEGIC SEALIFT OFFICER PROGRAM.” OPNAVINST 1534.1D § 12.b.5. Washington D.C., June 10, 2011.

Department of the Navy. “STRATEGIC SEALIFT OFFICER WARFARE INSIGNIA (SSOWI).” NAVADMIN 164/12 § 2.B. Washington D.C., May 18, 2012.


Original design of insignia as found in Uniform Board notes 1938.
usnr badge design


Dating the Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia is not very tricky. There are two main variations in design and two types: stamped metal and embroidered. The former continued to be worn until 2012 with planned phase-out in 2013. The embroidered device fell out of use in the mid-1950s along with all embroidered badges on US Navy officer uniforms. It has the interesting quality of being one of the longest-lived badges in the Navy and least awarded.

1938-1941
usnr insignia

The first pattern, as noted in the text is the own left-facing eagle.  It was issued until mid-1941.

This specific item is part of a Panama Railroad Steamship Company pursur grouping.  It is displayed along with a Merchant Marine Defense Ribbon; meaning it was worn at least until mid-Second World War.

1939-1940
usnr insignia

usnr insignia

This is a gold-plated pin from the pre-war period.  It was issued prior to mid-1941.  The insignia lacks a hallmark; as is the case with many pre-war items.

This item is of particular interest as it comes from a U.S. Maritime Commission Corps of Cadets cadet grouping dating to the regiment’s sojourn at Fort Schuyler.  Of interest is the fact that the original owner was relatively old at the time of enrollment, being 22; meaning he was probably a “cadet officer” and sailed under his license until Navy enlistment in 1943.  At the time college students were less apt to drop their course of study to join the Corps of Cadets, with hawsepipers making up a handful of cadets during this period.

1942
usnr insignia

usnr insignia

This is a Vanguard insignia that comes from a U.S. Merchant Marine Academy graduate that ended up being a junior radio officer; or a radio officer attached to the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. Further research is required on my part.

usnr insignia

1943
...

The above is from March 1943 granted after the Acceptance of Appointment as Midshipman, Merchant Marine in the U.S. Naval Reserve.

1944
usnr insignia

usnr insignia

Embroidery of the insignia was still of a high standard in 1944. Notice the overall difference with…

1945
usnr insignia

usnr insignia

1946
The following two insignias are from 1946.  Do note the difference in embroidery.

usnr insignia

usnr insignia

The first is on a black wool backing for wear with the USMMA dress jacket as well as on the Service Dress Blue coat.

The second is on a khaki twill backing; it was sewn on the khaki working coat.  This is an unusual example, as previously, cadet-midshipmen were directed to wear the pin device on khaki – khaki was commonly steamed, as opposed to dry-cleaned like the worsted wool.  When the pin was reinstated, this failed experiment was not repeated, as khaki working coats were no longer in a cadets-midshipman’s sea bag.

usnr insignia

The third device, with a Coro hallmark, also dates from the same period and was worn on dress whites of the period.

usnr insignia

usnr insignia

usnr insignia

2010
usnr insignia

The last item is a Vanguard insignia from 2010.  It was manufactured by International Insignia in Providence, Rhode Island.  Many Vanguard insignia items are actually jobbed out to International Insignia as Vanguard in recent years has apparently found contracting low volume orders more cost effective than striking them inhouse.  Notable would be the occasional IOH I-21 as opposed to V-21-N hallmark.

usnr insignia

liberty ship biographies

Beginning in 2009 and up until 2016, Clayton C. “Bud” Shortridge of New Haven, Indiana, churned out a number of informational texts regarding Liberty and Victory ships that were attacked by Axis forces. He passed away in July 2017, with his comcast site soon going offline; this left archive.org, blogspot, and several Google Docs links (mostly passworded and slated to disappear) as the holders of his work. In an effort to preserve his writing and to keep everything readily accessible for those interested, I have made available my archive of his articles.

A note: most of his information seems to come from The Liberty Ships from A (A. B. Hammond) to Z (Zona Gale) by Capt. Walter W. Jaffee, A Careless Word… A Needless Sinking: A History of the Staggering Losses Suffered By the U.S. Merchant Marine, Both in Ships and Personnel, During World War II by Capt. Arthur. Moore, and uboat.net.

branch distinction

As follows is a table of Branch Distinction colors found on officer shoulder boards and cuffs of Royal Navy uniforms per 1918 regulations, Merchant Navy livery as standardized by the British Board of Trade in 1918, U.S. Navy officer uniforms per 1919 U.S.N. uniform regulations, U.S. Army Transport Service regulations in effect from 1933-44, and United States Lines Steamship Co. rate detail from a 1937 passenger list brochure.

 

References

United States Lines SS Co. SS Washington Passenger List (Westbound) June 1937. United States Lines, New York, 1937


Although not fully detailed in the United States Lines chart, epaulets – or shoulder boards – followed the same design. Of interest is the fact that USL shoulder boards did not use the same button as the uniform coat.


Shoulder board, Royal South African Navy


Col.: Anon


References for the Collector

U.S. Maritime Service Commissioned and Warrant Officer hat
Winter hat; navy blue wool with wicker frame, ½-in. wide. gold bullion chinstrap and two 22½-ligne gilt cap screws.  (note: if strap is ¼-in., hat would be that of a warrant officer).
Circa Second World War.

It is one thing to collect, and another to actually know what one is collecting. As follows is a reference bibliography of use to collectors of Second World War period maritime insignia; I owe a great debt of gratitude to Herbert “Sarge” Booker for sharing with me his archive of The Crow’s Nest as well as placing me in contact with Rudy Barsuto, Steve Soto, and Dave Collar. Each of these individuals has proven an excellent correspondent in matters of maritime insignia.

Some of the references below deserve a bit of an introduction.  The Crow’s Nest is mainly a pictorial review in zine format shared among aficionados of maritime insignia and self-published by Sarge; in its various issues are India ink drawings done by Sarge complemented with photographs of various insignia and charts from uniform manuals; it is an interesting zine the likes of which I have never seen before (and perhaps never again).  Of particular interest are the self-published monographs by Steve Soto and Rudy Basurto; they synthesize and order collections.  In regard to Insignia by Mr. Basurto, it is a singular work that presents civilian insignia – it is a bit loose on time period, but most of the illustrations are from around the Second World War; Sarge was the artist, designer, and typesetter of study – he insisted I make this work available on this site.

Works that may be downloaded or purchased online have their titles in bold.

Rudy Basurto & Herbert Hillary “Sarge” Booker, 2nd
Insignia of America’s Little Known Seafarers, 2nd Ed. Privately Printed, nd.
Insignia of America’s Little Known Seafarers, 3rd Ed. (edited and revised by Steve Soto and Cynthia Soto).  Privately Printed, 2008.
N.B. May be purchased by contacting Mr. Soto.

Herbert Hillary “Sarge” Booker, 2nd
The Crow’s Nest #1 (Summer 1992).
The Crow’s Nest #2 (Autumn 1992).
The Crow’s Nest #3 (Winter 1992).
The Crow’s Nest #4 (New Year’s Special Issue – 1993).
The Crow’s Nest #5 (Summer 1993).
The Crow’s Nest #6 (Mid-Summer 1993).
The Crow’s Nest #7 (Autumn 1993).
The Crow’s Nest #8 (Special 1993 Encyclopedia Edition).
The Crow’s Nest #9 (Fall 1993).
The Crow’s Nest #10 (1994 New Year’s Special).
The Crow’s Nest #11 (Spring 1994).
The Crow’s Nest #11 (Spring 1994 – The Issue That Never Was).
The Crow’s Nest #12 (Summer 1994).
The Crow’s Nest #13 (Fall 1994).
Speciality and Distinguishing Marks: U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Maritime Service, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Public Health Service, 3rd Revision.  Privately Printed, 1996.

Dave Collar
“Insignia of the Army Transportation Service in World War II.” ASMIC: The Trading Post October-December 1994: 29-43.
“Insignia of the United States Maritime Service, World War II.” ASMIC: The Trading Post April-June 1995.
“Insignia of the United States Shipping Board.” ASMIC: The Trading Post  October-December 1996.

William K. Emerson
“Section XIII. The Army’s Navy: Chapter Thirty-Six.  Army Transport Service and Harbor Boat Service” in Encyclopedia of United States Army Insignia and Uniforms. Norman, Oklahoma:  University of Oklahoma Press, 1996. 331-352.

Steve Soto & Cynthia Soto
A collector’s guide to the History, Uniforms and Memorabilia of the U.S. Merchant Marine and Army Transport Service during World War II. Privately Printed, 1996 (revised 2008).
N.B. May be purchased by contacting Mr. Soto.

Joseph J. Tonelli
Visor hats of the United States Armed Forces: 1930-1950
. Atglen, Pennsylvania:  Schiffer Publications, 2003.
US Military Cap Insignia. Website with Joe’s (always growing) collection.

Jeff Warner
“U.S. Merchant Marine” in U.S. Navy Uniforms in World War II Series; Weapons, Equipment, and Insignia: Submarine Service, PT Boats, Coast Guard, other Sea Services. Atglen, Pennsylvania:  Schiffer Publications, 2008.

Insignia Houses

Where have all the insignia manufacturers of the American Merchant Marine managing operators gone? Long passed are the days of enamel flags on high-pressure caps, and so too is true for their makers. Through complex mergers and acquisitions, tools that once struck these diminutive flags found their way to the scrap heap or in the hands of other insignia houses.

GEMSCO of New York under the Elkies family once manufactured a majority of American Merchant Marine steamship company cap flags. The company was established in 1881 and later incorporated as Gordon, Elkies Military Supply Company, Inc. on 31 July 1934 with the State of New York, and in less than a month’s time re-registered as GEMSCO, Inc. on 8 August 1934 – although an abbreviation for the original company’s name, it was implied that it was an abbreviation for the trademark “General Embroidery & Military Supply Co., Inc.” which hid the company’s Eastern European roots. GEMSCO was a one-stop shop for all embroidered and metal insignia items. In time, as was a common practice among insignia houses, GEMSCO subcontracted out most of their production. Enamel flags went to The Reynolds Co. of East Providence, Rhode Island.

The period of mass cap flag manufacture was relatively short-lived in the United States – they had their heyday from the mid-1930s through the late 1940s. Until the 1930s, enamel work was not common for maritime insignia in the United States, but was widespread throughout the British shipping industry. The 1930s saw a shift in insignia styles, first with the Chapman-run United States Lines copying White Star Line’s uniform motifs, and then Dollar and Matson. Eventually, most shipping companies had an enamel flag on their employees’ caps – it was almost requisite for doing business as a serious company; along with the stock certificates with a steamship, a house flag, and buttons with said flag. This insignia innovation continued through the Second World War with GEMSCO providing the bulk of blue water shipping’s cap flags.

Style and economics brought an end to cap flags. Once an item worn by all, many mariners opted to wear their Government-issue cap eagles over cap flags while others switched to cheaper embroidered cap badges. GEMSCO provided the latter first from looms in New York, and then New Jersey. Notable exceptions were Ibrantsen, American Export, and United States Lines which continued to issue them through the 1950s and 1960s. With the collapse of the American Merchant Marine industry in the late 1960s, the market for maritime insignia items was no longer profitable, and their specialized manufacture ceased. In the case of GEMSCO, the company realigned its business during the 1970s with Denmark Military Equipment (D.M.E.) eventually buying Reynolds in the 1980s. Denmark operated Reynolds as the Topper Division of D.M.E. for about a decade, at the tail end of which they closed the East Providence location and subsequently, the tooling for cap flags disappeared – unfortunately, I am unaware as to the range of tools lost during the closure. GEMSCO went bankrupt in 1992 and went into re-organization; it decided to pursue contracts in the law enforcement market. Enamel cap flags are now created from old tools for collectors.

Below is a list of current insignia houses, from where their tools came, and the original owner. If the tools have since been discarded, I have indicated as such. After the list, I have provided vendors (Sources) who offer original or restrikes of the cap flags – and what flags they have in stock (current November 2022). As of 2022, Armour Insignia is the holder of most tools.


Argonaut Line (Armour restrike)

Tool Repositories

Armour Insignia (Nevada)

ex-Town & Country which acquired the stock of:
ex-Robbins

  • Mallory
  • Mowinckel

ex-Denmark Military Equipment [as Topper DME] (New York) which acquired the stock of:
ex-The Reynolds Co. (Lincoln/East Providence, Rhode Island) subcontractor for GEMSCO (New York):

  • Alcoa
  • American Export
  • American Export Isbrandtsen
  • American President
  • American Republic
  • American-Hawaiian
  • Argonaut
  • Black Diamond
  • Brovig
  • Central Gulf
  • Everett Orient
  • Farrell
  • Grace
  • Gulf & South American
  • Isbrandtsen
  • Joklar
  • Kerr
  • Knoch
  • Luckenbach
  • Matson
  • Moore-McCormack
  • Olsen & Uglestad
  • Panama Railroad
  • Rasmussen
  • Socony
  • Standard
  • States Marine
  • United Fruit
  • United States Lines

ex-GEMSCO:

  • U.S. Army Floating Plant & Dredges

ex-International Insignia which acquired the stock of Krew
ex-Krew:

  • The Great Lakes Dock & Dredge

ex-Blackintron:

  • Southern Pacific (Golden Gate Ferries)

ex-Blackintron which acquired the stock of Braxmar
ex-Charles G. Braxmar Co. (New York):

  • Hudson River Steam Navigation
  • New York Queens Ferry (NYQ)
  • Yonkers Ferry

☆ ☆ ☆

International Insignia (Providence, Rhode Island)

ex-Krew:

  • Hy-Line

☆ ☆ ☆

VH Blackinton (North Attleborough, Massachusetts)

current:

  • Cleveland Cliffs

ex-Charles G. Braxmar Co. (New York):

  • Clyde
  • J. H. Brown & Co.
  • Walter Runciman & Co. / Moor Line

ex-GEMSCO (New York) scrapped 1970s:

  • American Mail
  • Anchor
  • B&Y
  • Central American
  • Cunard
  • Dollar Line (Steward)
  • Dow Chemical
  • ET (Eastern Transport Co.)
  • Essberger
  • Munson
  • New York & Cuba
  • Nobco
  • Oceanic & Oriental
  • P&O
  • Panama Pacific & Bull
  • Standard
  • United States Lines
  • Ward
  • Waterman

Sources

When they’re gone, they’re gone… Below find dealers of Period – original cap flags – and only active dealer offering re-strikes.

Period

Joshua Segal of Lost Legions Militaria in Alexandria, Virginia (https://www.ebay.com/str/lostlegionsmilitaria) is the only known source of GEMSCO-manufactured United States Lines cap flags from the 1930s and early 1940s. His stock comes from the 1992 Army-Navy store close-out and liquidation sale.

☆ ☆ ☆

Stephen E. Lipski, based in New Jersey, is another merchant on eBay (https://www.ebay.com/sch/reatra05/m.html) who has some stock of original GEMSCO-manufactured cap badges. His stock comes from an Army-Navy store close-out about three decades ago. He offers:

  • American Export Lines
  • American President Lines
  • American-Hawaiian Steamship Company
  • Matson Lines
  • Panama Railroad Steamship Line

☆ ☆ ☆

For over a decade, Robert Steinberg of Pinback Paradise (https://www.ebay.com/str/pinbackparadise) in Medford, New Jersey has been offering the same two cap flags:

  • American President Lines
  • American-Hawaiian Steamship Company

His stock came from the buy-out of the stock of another dealer two decades ago.

Restrikes

Armour Insignia in Henderson, Nevada (http://armourinsignia.com/) has restrikes available of the following (November 2022):

  • American Export Line
  • American-Hawaiian Steamship Company
  • American President Lines
  • American-Export Isbrandtsen Lines
  • Argonaut
  • Grace Line
  • Great Lakes Dock & Dredge
  • Hudson River Steam Navigation
  • Isbrandtsen
  • Moore-McCormack Lines
  • New York Queens Ferry
  • Olsen & Uglestad
  • Southern Pacific Steamship Lines (via Blackinton)
  • Yonkers Ferry

Armour Insignia GEMSCO re-strikes are easy to differentiate from period cap badges – the planchets are a bit thicker and have no hallmark; from 1942 onward, GEMSCO hallmarked most of their badges.

“abercrombie”

The summer before I went to college, I was not so worried about leaving home for the first time, I was concerned I did not have what it took to be a good Naval Officer. My doubts came when I received a letter about O-week. This was an orientation, I learned, about life as a Naval ROTC midshipman. I figured it would be a nice way to get to school early and get my bearings. The doubts came when I heard that it was some sort of boot camp where upperclassmen attempted to break-in lubbers. I thought I had it over all of them, since I lived in the Navy for my entire life.

I grew up in the shadow of my Grandfather who was a warrant officer and then LDO, and my step-father who was a chief and LDO in the Navy. Both of them came to the Navy from two different generations. The Navy of my Grandfather was a collegial place – he was in the submarine community. My stepfather’s Navy was bogged down in seemingly petty politics – of who said what at the wardroom table or “college boys” looking down on my stepfather because he did not have the formal education they had. From my perspective, a Naval Officer had dignity about them, were detail-oriented, and honorable to a fault. I felt as though I was a good fit for the role.

One of the first things we did at O-week was to get our photographs taken for ID cards. Name placards were made and we were handed a pile of clothes. My first evening at college was spent polishing my shoes. I taught others around me how to do it since I had been polishing shoes for years. We were also shown how to iron our khakis. I too had this down from years of practice.

The PT in the morning was annoying but bearable. The marching up and down sidewalks in tight formation felt silly. In the classroom, we were constantly being yelled at for the smallest of mistakes. One of my fellow inductees was reamed out for not knowing the NATO alphabet having only been told it once. I did lots of pushups because I called a fellow with a name plaque that read Moran, “moron.” He didn’t like that. I was forced to remove my name plaque and replace it with one emblazoned with the name “Abercrombie.” I had to spell it at a moment’s notice in the NATO alphabet. I never stumbled spelling ALPHA BRAVO ECHO ROMEO CHARLIE ROMEO OSCAR MIKE BRAVO INDIA ECHO – my childhood was spent staring at signal flags and studying the military.

I understood what they were attempting to do: to break me. Despite what might be called hazing, I was motivated to excel. They could not break me.

One evening, though, I realized I didn’t want to be part of the Navy, not this Navy. This realization came when I was sitting in my room and I overheard upperclassmen saying how they couldn’t wait to have a taste of fresh meat. As their conversation continued, I realized they were talking about a group of young women in our group and they went into lurid detail about how they planned on getting them drunk and showing them a “real man.” My head burned with anger. I knew I would not be able to bear being around other students referring to incoming first-year women as fresh meat. The next day, I gathered up the courage and told the unit’s CO I just didn’t have what it took and wished to separate from the unit. Later that afternoon, I gave the Yeoman all my uniforms and called my parents. I felt like a complete failure.

I was given a pair of boards by the Yeoman in parting. He thought I was a good kid. They were apparently antique.

In retrospect, I should not have left on some made-up excuse, in that I didn’t feel I was cut out for the Navy. I should have told the CO I was disgusted with my classmates and I found their comments abhorrent. I should have been an ally to the young women who were participating in O-week. However, I wasn’t mentally prepared to say what I needed to say. What I heard instead were shades of my stepfather’s comments toward women and this was a culture not for me.

A couple of years after I left NROTC I bumped into a fellow midshipman. We chatted a bit, he was planning on becoming an aviator, and I was just accepted to grad school. When I told him a regretted dropping out, he told me I would never have made it anyway – my problem was that I was too sensitive and I needed to toughen up. The Navy had no place for an officer like me. I asked him about the young women in the program – in a low voice he told me one of them was sexually assaulted, but it was all hush-hush.

NOMMP not USSB

Sadly, it seems whenever a collector of maritime uniform insignia comes across a Federal-style shield with three white stars, automatically the assumption is the insignia comes from the United States Shiping Board (USSB). Not so.

These cap badges are the official insignia of the National Organization of Masters, Mates, and Pilots (NOMMP). This group was (and still is) a bargaining unit for Deck Officers aboard United States-flag vessels.

The assumption is quite easy to make since NOMMP’s cap badge looks very similar to the insignia worn by USSB employees. However, some also forget that USSB was abolished by Executive Order 6166 of 10 June 1933, and all its functions, including those with respect to United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corporation, was transferred to United States Shipping Board Bureau, Department of Commerce, effective 2 March 1934 (at this point USSB no longer issued independent annual reports); USSB separation of employees was deferred until 30 September 1933 by Executive Order 6245 of 9 August 1933. The Bureau’s functions were assumed by the United States Maritime Commission (USMC) on 26 October 1936, pursuant to Act of 29 June 1936 (49 Stat. 1985). A chart detailing the Emergency Fleet Corporation’s lines (which USSB managed) from 1919 through the dissolution of federally-managed lines in 1940 (as under USMC); the chart is here.

from The Master, Mate and Pilot. Volume 8, Number 4, April 1945, p. 15.

Although not stated in the description, the design elements are fairly straightforward. The wreath is the same as used on the United States Maritime Service cap insignia; the cable loop is interesting since it is a vestige of a fouled anchor element on the Gemsco-designed USMS cap insignia. The shield itself is a novel design; the three white stars are representative of the three groups of officers represented by the union: Masters, Mates, and Pilots. Note that the central star is shifted slightly upward from the other two – this is the tell-tale indicator of NOMMP stamped-metal cap badges. The badge’s colors are patriotic, and the design is quasi-naval. Surmounting the shield and wreath is an eagle – at the time it was in fashion for licensed officers to have eagles on their cap badges as a symbol of their shipboard authority.


S. Appel & Company on 14-18 Fulton St. in New York was the official distributor and manufacturer of the insignia. They provided both embroidered, and stamped-metal and enamel versions of the same.

Captain Holger Emile Sorensen, Merchant Marine Distinguished Service Medal recipient, October 1943. Note: regulations codified in 1944 and published in 1945.

The raison d’être for the creation of distinctive insignia is due to the fact that during the mid-1940s, NOMMP wished to distinguish itself from the newly-minted and not-always unionized mariners in the United States Merchant fleet. Since shipboard uniforms were not codified by law, NOMMP tinkered with the dress of the day. Unlike the confusing array of regulations for United States Maritime Service (USMS) officers with appointed rank based upon ship tonnage, NOMMP used lace stripes to designate position aboard a vessel. Buttons were adorned with plain anchors – which in practice was not the between war anchor button – rather the anchor and two stars design used at the time by the United States Merchant Marine Academy Cadet Corps.

1944 regulations in full:


Sometimes NOMMP members made do with cap badges they had on hand and painted them. The above is an example of a late-war Gemsco naval officer cap badge painted to indicate the wearer as a NOMMP member. This same cap insignia was often defaced to create cap badges for the re-organized Army Transport Service under the Army Transportation Corps – Water Division. In some literature (Tonelli and Booker), it is called a WSA (War Shipping Administration) cap badge; this may be an incorrect attribution – a discussion of known WSA badges may be found here (ship pilot) and here (Field Service) – but given the spotty nature of period documentation, the jury is still out.


References

Joseph J. Tonelli. Visor hats of the United States Armed Forces: 1930-1950. Atglen, Pennsylvania:  Schiffer Publications, 2003. N.B.: For his identified images of WSA badges.


Collection items

https://dittybag.ianewatts.org/collection/items/browse?tags=NOMMP

U.S. Maritime Service Chief Petty Officer

 

U.S. Maritime Commission Cadre /
U.S. Maritime Service Chief Petty Office cap badge (Type 1)

One piece construction.  Seal, 25mm diameter; Anchor, 50mm length.
Obscured AE CO N.Y. hallmark (American Emblem Company)
Anchor and device stamped brass; blue enamel band and red, white & blue shield.
Early Second World War era; 1942.

This is the first design of the USMS CPO hat badge; it was worn in 1942 up until the formal transfer of the Prospective Licensed Officer training program from the USCG to the WSA/USMS in July 1942.  The badge itself may be found in plain brass, as well as plated silver or nickel.  This brass pattern was issued in 1942, followed by plated silver or nickel badges and then a new design came about in August 1942.  A description of the second design may be found here.  In practice, in the period leading up to the Second World War, USMS CPOs, more often than not wore the more handsome embroidered hat badges – which were of the same design as the stamped metal device, albeit without the band of stars – as evidenced by an image in the article “Heros of Wartime Science and Mercy” in National Geographic Magazine, December 1943 page 717, as seen here.  These badge were worn mostly by officer trainees – who held the rank of Chief Petty Officer.

Concurrent with WSA control of the USMS, and the stripping away of the ship-building component of the USMS,  came a color and design shift:  for the hat badge: the illustrated deco motif of a stylized Federal “classic shield” gave way to a detailed foul anchor charge on “official shield” of finer detail.  Whereas the first design was predominantly blue, the color changed to red – perhaps to echo the red of chevrons and other woven cloth devices found on an enlistedman’s uniform.  My research has alluded to that late in the war, the CPO badge further changed to match the pattern found on USMS buttons (1942-1954); I will post an image of this badge at a later date.

J. Tonelli in Visor Hats of the US Armed Forces incorrectly asserts that the illustrated hat badge was worn by USMS Warrant Officers; however, regulations of the time state that Warrant Officers wear the same devices as regular, commissioned officers.  This is a commonly made mistake when attempting to devise a typology of hat devices for a relatively small organization with a small array of hat insignia.

Overall, the USMS only had a handful of CPOs and these were attached to USMS enrollment offices, training stations, officer schools and the US Merchant Marine Academy; CPO insignia was not issued to regular seamen who were matriculated from or were certified by the USMS. CPOs represented unlicensed seaman hired by the USMS skilled in the maritime industry with some seniority or specialized skills not satisfying the grade of Warrant Officer; it is useful to think of USMS CPOs as experienced Able Seamen (AB).


USMS CPO Hat badge, obverse.
This device was worn by Merchant Mariners attached to the US Maritime Commission involved in training duties; this badge eventually found its way to be only worn by senior unlicensed personnel (CPOs).  This hat badge continued to be issued until stocks were depleted and eventually replaced by a badge of the same design – albeit in nickel (pre- and early war), and then replaced by the more familiar USMS CPO device.  There is some speculation that the USMC/USMS CPO device was modeled after the US Coast Guard enlisted hat badge; the USCG badge went into production in 1942, around the same time as the production of the USMC/USMS badge.

The mystery of the design lies in the double-anchor and seal motif.  If analyzed closely, the badge hearkens to the precursor agency of both the US Maritime Commission and US Coast Guard:  the US Revenue Cutter Service.  In this light, the anchor stock and flukes, and as well as the rope on the stock themselves echo the old seal.  At the time of its creation, it was not stated in USMC regulations, but the uniforms and ranks of the soon-to-be-formed USMS were eventually codified to mirror that of the US Coast Guard.  In time, in an effort to create an esprit de corps and the forging of an independent identity, the badge change to the second design.


USMS CPO Hat badge, reverse.


USMS CPO Hat badge, reverse (detail).
Note the curious “CO N.Y.” hallmark – the complete “AE CO N.Y.” mark is obscured by the post – this is of the American Emblem Company of Utica, New York. This firm produced a number of Merchant Marine and Maritime Service items during the Second World War, most notably the ubiquitous Merchant Mariner pin.  In regard to this specific badge, NS Meyer produced a very similar insignia set for USMS officers using a similar central device. With the button and device change in 1942, AE Co. was no longer contracted to make USMS CPO badges; rather, the jobbing went to Coro.