USMMA Iron Platoon Ribbon


Iron Platoon Ribbon

This is a unit commendation ribbon awarded after Indoctrination. It is for the platoon that scores highest in PT.

Awarded to those midshipmen who were members of the Iron Platoon for their class’ Indoctrination. The Regimental Evaluations Officer (REO) is authorized to be the recommending official for this award. (USMMA MIDSHIPMAN UNIFORM REGULATIONS, 11 August 2017)

vanguard #3406 nex: iron platoon

USMMA Spirit Platoon Ribbon


Spirit Platoon Ribbon

This is a unit commendation ribbon awarded after Indoctrination.

Awarded to those midshipmen who were members of the Spirit Platoon for their class’ Indoctrination. The Regimental Evaluations Officer (REO) is authorized to be the recommending official for this award. (USMMA MIDSHIPMAN UNIFORM REGULATIONS, 11 August 2017)

vanguard #3509 nex: spirit platoon

USMMA Seamanship Platoon Ribbon

Seamanship Platoon Ribbon (2018)

This is a unit commendation ribbon awarded after Indoctrination.

Awarded to those midshipmen who were members of the Seamanship Platoon for their class’ Indoctrination. The Regimental Evaluations Officer (REO) is authorized to be the recommending official for this award. (USMMA MIDSHIPMAN UNIFORM REGULATIONS, 11 August 2017)

vanguard #4001 nex: seamanship platoon
vanguard #3508 sku 784600 (original)

In 2017 the ribbon was thus:

Seamanship Platoon Ribbon (2017)

USMMA Marine Society of NY Award

Marine Society of the City of New York Award

This award is sponsored by the Marine Society of the City of New York. It is a pair of binoculars is given to the Midshipman in each graduating class who has demonstrated outstanding interest, aptitude and professional proficiency in seagoing activities at the Academy. The Head, Department of Professional Development & Career Services selects the recipient based upon the recommendations of Academy Training Representatives (ATRs) – individuals within the Department of Professional Development & Career Services who coordinate midshipmen activities during their Sea Year. The award is presented at graduation.

The award was first presented in 1991.

Many thanks to Ms. Karen Laino of the Society for her assistance.

USMMA Drill Instructor Service Ribbon


Drill Instructor Service Ribbon

This is a Regiment ribbon.

At the end of Indoctrination, 50 upperclassmen who serve as Drill Instructors for the around 250 incoming plebe candidates are awarded the Drill Instructor Ribbon. A veteran Drill Instructor may affix a bronze star to their ribbon, denoting their status as Senior or Experienced Drill Instructor. By tradition, the Drill Instructor (DI) is also known as a “pusher.”

vanguard #? nex: drill ins


with bronze star

Awarded to midshipmen who successfully complete the Drill Instructor / Squad Leader Training Program and participate in Indoctrination. Subsequent awards shall be indicated by 5/16 inch silver stars. The Regimental Training Officer (RTO) is authorized to be the recommending official for this award. (USMMA MIDSHIPMAN UNIFORM REGULATIONS, 11 August 2017)

U.S. Naval Reserve Insignia reprise

U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Midshipman Identification badge.

U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point, NY.
Circa 2017.
The Eagle Pin.


Midshipmen at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point met the proscription of the U.S. Naval Reserve badge from their uniforms of by the Chief of Naval Operations in June 2011 with mild derision. The Academy administration did not, and quietly resurrected the pin for local use in 2013. For the almost seventy-five year existence of the Regiment of Midshipmen, Kings Pointers pinned the insignia on their uniforms with pride. If no other piece of insignia or decoration adorned midshipmen coats or shirts, the Sea Chicken was present. Its removal echoed a larger narrative of the changing rôle of merchant seamen within the U.S. military establishment and the struggle of the Merchant Marine to remain relevant in an age where Federal maritime policy has been one of neglect. Its reappearance emphasizes its symbolic status and importance within the midshipmen community.

Often a means for military and paramilitary organizations to cultivate group cohesion is through the selective disbursement of insignia among its members. Insignia falls into three broad classes: rank designator, personal award, and unit identifier.  Rank insignia indicates seniority and managerial responsibility within an organization. As one achieves seniority, the uniform is updated with a progression of rank pins; with another stripe or another star comes additional opportunities for command. Badges are awarded for knowledge area expertise; this recognition enables the wearer to feel invested in their rôle. By comparison, unit identifiers embody continuity with the past and promote a mythos of belonging. Thus, a uniform’s accouterments operate as potent coded visual markers and their configuration signal mimetically shared traditions. Through deciphering insignia at salute distance, by those within or trained in the organization’s symbolic language, can one divine a member’s seniority, skill area, and place in the organization’s hierarchy. Among insignia, badges are often more coveted than rank insignia. Badges are objects of prestige for what they represent: a skill, a position of trust, or an achievement. In this light, wearers meet the removal of a badge with some degree of resistance and critique unless done to signify a merit-based change of status. Without group consultation, the act of removal may cultivate ill will.

No discussion of the U.S. Naval Reserve (USNR) badge’s deletion is complete without a sketch of contemporary U.S. Naval culture. The U.S. Navy is compartmentalized and hierarchical in structure. It has aligned its officers into communities. The prestige of attaining rank and qualifications governs these communities. The culture is such that badges represent a passage through a figurative ritual process denoting one’s advancement as a militarized officer. In the specific case of the Surface Warfare Officer (SWO) badge, these rituals include watch standing and mastering damage control. In fact, among the surface officer communities, the award of the badge separates those junior in subject mastery from those who hold advanced, compartmentalized knowledge. In the Surface Supply Corps, if a junior officer does not earn that community’s badge while afloat, they rotate back to shore; this acts as an impetus for the officer to return to the prestige of a ship billet. Moreover, if a junior officer does not earn the SWO badge, they, in turn, do not advance in rank. Since the U.S. Navy has a limited number of billets, failure to advance results in eventual discharge from the service.

The SWO badge has an analog in the enlisted community; it is the Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist (ESWS) badge. The design is similar to the officer’s except it has enlisted cutlasses as opposed to an officer’s swords, and is brushed silver in finish. The prerequisites for earning the enlisted badge are similar to the officer’s badge but dissimilar enough to warrant a separate award. This badge, though, is not the determiner of a sailor’s “fitness”; however, earning it enables an enlisted sailor to advance in rank and opens a hatch for entry into the surface officer community.  Junior commissioned officers seen wearing the silver ESWS badge are members of a small community of “Limited Duty Officers” or ex-enlisted sailors who by virtue of specialized knowledge and ambition are granted entry into the officer corps.  These individuals call themselves “Mustangs.” After completing the requisite – or what they call “Mickey Mouse” – qualifications, they replace the ESWS for the SWO badge. The replacement of the badge is not done grudgingly; Mustangs are keen to take on the mantle of regular officers and undergo the breadth of rituals associated with the prestige of rank. The only obvious markers of their previous status as an enlisted sailor after attaining the SWO badge would be the deep crimson ribbon for “Good Conduct” in their ribbon rack.

Through a confluence of events and tradition of use, the USNR badge mediates a position of both a skill badge and a unit identifier for the Kings Pointer. As I have discussed before, the badge was created expressly to identify members of the newly formulated U.S. Naval Reserve Merchant Marine Reserve. In time, it was adopted by cadets of the U.S. Maritime Commission and awarded to cadet-midshipmen at state maritime academies (CFR 1941 Title 46 §293.16 “they shall wear such Naval Reserve insignia”). Despite Kings Pointers sharing a similar uniform and speaking the same military vocabulary as their colleagues at the U.S. Naval Academy, the badge became an integral identifier of Kings Pointers and marked them apart. Since the badge was an official U.S. Navy decoration, and since Kings Pointers wore the badge past graduation aboard U.S. Navy ships and auxiliary vessels, it identified them as maritime professionals serving with the U.S. Navy. In this discrete definition, the badge spoke to their community and unique skill-set from the moment they entered the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point. Thus, like Mustangs and their silver ESWS badge, the USNR badge denotes membership in a small group of mariners within the ranks of the U.S. Navy officer community. It specifies Naval Officers who completed various prerequisites and swore an oath, at one time or another, as members of the Merchant Marine Reserve (USNR/MMR).

It is worth mentioning that the USNR badge was deleted from the Kings Point midshipman uniform once before during a stretch from 1956 to 1964. Congressional and U.S. Navy oversight legislated away the status of U.S. Navy Midshipman Reserve for the Kings Pointer; this was due to ending the Merchant Marine Reserve Program. The U.S. Merchant Marine Academy and its allies argument for the reinstatement of the program was that many students enrolled at the Academy for the opportunity to become licensed officers of the U.S. Merchant Marine and for the prestige of joining the U.S. Armed Services as a commissioned officer. Conventional wisdom at the time held, if they wished to simply sail, they could go to a state maritime school. After Congress addressed the oversight and reestablished the program, Kings Pointers reclaimed the title of midshipmen and donned the pin once again.

Popular backlash from the Vietnam War resulted in problems for the U.S. Armed Services to attract recruits after the cessation of hostilities. This, coupled with former volunteers leaving the military in droves, resulted in too many vacancies and a weakened threat response by the military. The U.S. Navy, long a proponent of bifurcation of Active duty and Reserve personnel, found this segregation counter-intuitive for maintaining a ready force and wasteful of resources. Thus, under Admiral Zumwalt, it re-organized its personnel system and abolished both the formal and informal barriers between “regular” and “reserve” officers.  Among those in the latter class were U.S. Merchant Marine Academy graduates.  As a means of identifying Merchant Marine Reserve Officers who took active commissions, and indicating their important contribution to the mission of U.S. Navy, in 1978 the Bureau of Personnel wrote into regulation the ability to wear the USNR badge on the uniforms of active duty officers. This reversed an explicit 45-year prohibition of its wear and gave a long overdue nod to maritime professionals who chose to “Go Navy.” This symbol of status and prestige remained unchanged until 2011.

During early 2011, the U.S. Navy underwent another personnel realignment and rewrote the specifications for its various officer communities. Among those programs written out of existence was the U.S. Naval Reserve/Merchant Marine Reserve (USNR/MMR). Despite their military education component falling under the auspices of the U.S. Navy Education Command, Kings Pointers remained in the U.S. Naval Reserve, but MMR became a component of the Strategic Sealift Officer (SSO) community. Strictly speaking, the USNR badge represented the identification of a class of individuals who no longer existed within the U.S. Navy. A press release from the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations states:

Extensive coordination with several Navy organizations and the U.S. Maritime Administration helped with the program change.

The SSOP [Strategic Sealift Officer Program] supports national defense sealift requirements and capabilities, which are executed by Military Sealift Command (MSC). The program provides the Navy with officers that possess sealift, maritime operations, and logistics subject matter expertise, and further hold U.S. Coast Guard credentials as Merchant Marine officers.

“These changes will help align and improve support to Military Sealift Command and numerous other Joint and Navy commands,” said Vice Adm. Bill Burke, Deputy CNO for Fleet Readiness and Logistics, who is the SSOP program sponsor. “This revision improves stewardship, integration, and opportunities for about 2,400 Navy Reserve officers.”

The SSOP, like the old MMR Program, will continue to provide the capability for emergency crewing of sealift ships and shoreside support to Navy commands that require unique maritime expertise. Further, this change provides opportunities for greater operational support to the Navy by expanding selected Reserve (SELRES) billets and active duty recalls to SSOP officers. (Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. “Merchant Marine Reserve Program becomes Strategic Sealift Officer Program” NNS110616-16 Release Date: 6/16/2011.)

The new program brought with it a new badge and provisions to earn it. Unlike the USNR badge, a midshipman could not earn the SSWO badge by pledging an oath, as done when formally entering the USNR/MMR; in fact, the initial CNO communication explicitly mentioned midshipmen (at Kings Point and the State Maritime Academies) were not authorized to wear the new badge. This singled-out of Kings Pointers and rubbed a bit of salt in the wound since earning this new badge was unattainable for the duration of a midshipman’s tenure at the Academy. In an ironic twist, the new badge’s design gives a nod to its historical roots – it keeps the “eagle from the USS Constitution’s stern” and places over it crossed U.S Navy officer swords behind a Federal U.S. shield surcharged with “a fouled anchor from the U.S. Merchant Marine flag” (U.S. Navy Uniform Regulations NAVPERS 15665I, 5201.2.bbb). The last design note is deemed particularly insensitive by some Kings Point alumni since one of the few locations that fly U.S. Merchant Marine flags is Kings Point. As a matter of course, the Strategic Sealift Officer program only mans Military Sealift Command ships – thus only mariners attached to MSC will ever earn the badge; in essence, the SSWO badge very clearly pigeonholes maritime school graduates as being merchant mariners in the U.S. Navy. Whereas the USNR badge was more democratic in its wear; Kings Point midshipmen and graduates wore it while attached to any of the U.S. Navy’s activities and not just the MSC.

Nevertheless, with the change, the Kings Point class of 2013, became the last Kings Pointers to wear the USNR badge. Upon graduation, those who took oaths as commissioned officers in the U.S. Navy removed the USNR badge, and due to permutations of administrative procedures, could immediately wear the new SSWO badge. The class of 2014 and all those that followed did not have this opportunity. Unless the Academy took action, incoming U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Plebe candidates would find themselves without the once proud symbol of their Federal service status and obligation on Acceptance Day; as mentioned before, the badge awarding ceremony is the first ritual Kings Point midshipmen participate in at the Academy.

The U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Commandant, under the provisions of U.S. Code (CFR 2006 Title 46 §51308.1), could prescribe the wear and standards of uniforms at the Academy. Under this umbrella, he granted the Regiment of Midshipmen their distinctive uniforms and ability to wear pieces of insignia and awards specific to the Academy. With word of the deletion of the old badge, the Academy administration was quick to act, and after consultation with the insignia manufacturer, Vanguard Industries, they came up with a redesign of the traditional badge and new name. Vanguard first manufactured the badge on July 11, 2013; afterward, the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Ship’s Store stocked the item as “MM BDG MIDSHIP ID GLD” – U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Midshipman Identification Badge in Gold.

The Ship’s Store initially ordered 900 units of the new badge. On the same Purchase Order was a $500 tooling fee for the new die. Kings Point, in effect, now owns a key component of their identity. The badge is a Kings Point-only uniform item. It is similar to the old USNR badge with the exception that four stars replaced the letters U S N R on the scroll beneath the eagle. When in uniform, Kings Pointers at the Academy will continue to look as they have for decades, thus keeping visual continuity and cultivating an esprit de corps. They call it simply: “The Eagle Pin.”

On graduation day, when Kings Pointers become active-duty commissioned officers or join the ranks of those in reserve, they will continue to remove the re-designed USNR badge. Within the U.S. Navy, their unique identity is no longer as markedly visible as before. Since a Kings Pointer is thrifty to a fault, they will reuse their old uniforms, and they will be distinctive by the shadow of two pinholes on their khaki shirts and Service Dress blues. Time will tell whether or not the U.S. Navy will re-establish the oldest of its badges. Until then, Kings Pointers will work for their sanctioned pins and place them over the outline of their first.

Special thanks are owed to the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Alumni Association and Foundation in granting me access to their trove of old yearbooks and for publishing my previous article on the subject; the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Ship’s Store for answering my queries about the badge; Vanguard Industries for furnishing me with production dates of “The Eagle Pin”; and many others who endured my inane questions about what the old badge meant to them. Thank you all.


Note

The naming convention for the USNR badge has changed over time. In the 1930s documentation refers to it as a USNR insigne and during the Cold War, it became a USNR badge. In colloquial speech, it is today called a USNR pin. I use badge as this is the term commonly used by archivists and collectors in both the United States and British Commonwealth. Insigne (an outmoded term for a single piece of insignia), insignia, badge, and pin nomenclature holds in any discussion of U.S. Naval uniform insignia.


U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Midshipman Identification Badge in Gold.
U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point, NY.
Single piece, solid construction.
Hallmark, V-21-N (Vanguard Industries)
Circa 2017.


Despite some talk that the badge has a variant with no stars, the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Ship’s Store staff (the sole distributor of the badge) and Vanguard Industries (the sole manufacturer of the badge) have communicated to me that there is no such variant.


Strategic Sealift Officer Warfare badge.
U.S. Navy.
Two piece construction; punched anchor device.
Hallmark, V-21-N (Vanguard Industries)
Circa 2017.



U.S. Naval Merchant Marine Reserve insignia (miniature).
U.S. Navy.
Single piece, solid construction.
Eagle stamped sterling silver with gold-plate.
Hallmark, Vanguard N.Y.
Circa 1943.



Surface Warfare Office badge.
U.S. Navy.
Single piece, solid construction.
Hallmark, V-21-N (Vanguard Industries)
Circa 2017.


Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist badge.
U.S. Navy
Single piece, hollow construction.
Hallmark, V-21-N (Vanguard Industries)
Circa 1979. The badge is pinned above the ribbon rack on a Zummy uniform reefer.

The U.S. Navy sometimes errs in re-writing uniform regulations. Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, Jr., the Chief of Naval Operations, wished to “humanize a service soured by the war in Vietnam” and ordered a drastic change in the uniform for enlisted sailors in 1971. Out were the bell-bottom trousers, buttonless jumpers, black silk four-in-hands tie, and white Bob Evans sailor’s caps. They were replaced with military shirts, straight-legged trousers, pewter-buttoned reefers, neckties, and combination hats. The enlisted sailor became almost indistinguishable in appearance from officers and chief petty officers. This order became mandatory in 1973 when morale in the U.S. Navy was at a low. The thought was if enlisted sailors felt they looked professional, they would take more pride in the service.

However, the changes Admiral Zumwalt initiated resulted in the opposite. Reportedly, the change in uniform caused a problem in morale among career petty officers; they complained loudly that discipline suffered and sailors wanted their crackerjacks back. On August 1, 1977, the Secretary of the Navy John Lehman, supported CNO Admiral James L. Holloway III’s order to return to the old uniform. In classic U.S. Navy style there was a year-long evaluation period before the release of “BuPers Notice 1020 of 22 March 1978” allowing for jumper-style uniform purchase by those testing the new uniform.  In July of the same year, U.S. Navy Uniform Regulations, 1978 came out permitting the rest of the fleet Seamen to Petty Officers Second Class the same. By 1984, The service collectively breathed a sigh of relief when the “Zummy uniform” finally was out for all.

But, the uniforms were not retired soon enough for the ESWS badge to be pinned on the above reefer.


Surface Warfare Officer (top) & Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist badge (bottom)  (subdued).
U.S. Navy
Single piece, solid construction.
Hallmark, V-21-N (Vanguard Industries)
Circa 2017.


Both the officer and enlisted badges have subdued versions for wear in joint combat operations or attached to Fleet Marine Forces, in brown and black metal, respectively. In the U.S. Navy, rank insignia and the SWO/ESWS badge, gold becomes brown and silver black when subdued.


Surface Warfare Officer (top) & Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist badge (bottom)  (subdued) – reverse.



References

Coming Soon… The New Uniforms.All Hands. 675 (April 1973), p 3-7.

Jumper Style Uniform Guidance Provided.All Hands. 736 (May 1978), p 3.

Traditional Uniform Returns to Navy.All Hands. 737 (June 1978), p 4.

James C. Bradford. America, Sea Power, and the World. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. see “Z-grams: Zumwalt’s Reforms” p 308

The New York Times & Clyde Haberman. “August 2, 1977: Navy Reviving Bell-Bottoms” in New York Times The Times of the Seventies: The Culture, Politics, and Personalities that Shaped the Decade. Running Press, Nov 12, 2013.

Rogers Worthington “Saluting A Return To Navy Tradition: To Rebellion And Back In A Decade.Chicago Tribune, July 05, 1986.

Thomas H. Lee, Jr. “Blue Navy.The Harvard Crimson, December 7, 1972.

United States. Bureau of Naval Personnel. U.S. Navy Uniform Regulations, 1978. Department of Defense, Navy Department, Bureau of Naval Personnel, 1979.

United States. Bureau of Naval Personnel. United States Navy Uniform Regulations, 1985. Department of Defense, Navy Department, Bureau of Naval Personnel, 1985.

United States. Bureau of Naval Personnel. U.S. Navy Uniform Regulations NAVPERS 15665I.  Department of Defense, Navy Department, Bureau of Naval Personnel, 2013.

United States. Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. “Merchant Marine Reserve Program becomes Strategic Sealift Officer Program” NNS110616-16 Release Date: 6/16/2011.

United States. Code of Federal Regulations of the United States of America 1941 Supplement Titles 46-50. National Archives, Washington D.C., 1943.

U.S. Naval Reserve Insignia

U.S. Naval Merchant Marine Reserve insignia.
Single construction.
Eagle stamped brass with gold-plate.
1939-1940.
badge: 2-3/4in from tip to tip of wings.

 


In October 1942, a curious chain of memoranda was passed between the New York State Maritime Academy Superintendent and various U.S. Navy officials. Prompted by Kings Point cadet uniforms having sewn on them a previously professional only device in preparation for a parade on the 24th of the month, the NYSMA Superintendent had a valid question, and perhaps potentially a little egg-on-face for his counterpart across Long Island Sound. The notes touched on the eligibility of cadets at the aforementioned academy to wear a relatively recent badge: the U.S. Naval Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia. This insignia came to be called the U.S. Naval Reserve Insignia, or simply the Sea Chicken.


(580) Dy
October 14, 1942

From: The Superintendent, New York State Maritime
Academy.
To: The Chief of Naval Personnel.
Via: The Commandant, Third Naval District.
Subject: Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia.
Wear On Academy Uniform.
Reference: (a) Art. 16-9 of Chapter XVI of U.S. Navy
Uniform Regulations, 1941.

1. Information is requested whether the insignia
described in reference (a) is authorized to be worn on
the dress uniform of cadets enrolled in this academy who
hold appointments as Midshipmen in the Merchant Marine
Reserve, U.S. Naval Reserve, and who do not hold licenses
issued by Marine Inspection Service.

/s/ Thos. T. Craven.
[Vice Admiral T. T. Craven, U.S.N.]

1st endorsemnet
JJ55-3
DMq09:cs

19 October 1942.

From: The Commandant, Third Naval District.
To: The Chief of Naval Personnel.

1. Forwarded.
2. The Commandant considers that the Merchant Marine
Reserve insignia is intended to give recognition to
merchant marine officers employed by private companies
who are members of the Naval Reserve, and, therefore,
does not recommend that cadets enrolled in the New
York State Maritime Academy be authorized to wear this
insignia.

/s/ Paul P. Blackburn,
By direction.

26 October 1942
Pers-1016--KS
JJ55-3(1522)

From: The Chief of Naval Personnel.
To: The Superintendent,
New York State Maritime Academy,
Fort Schuyler, The Bronx, N.Y.
Via: The Commandant Third Naval District.
Subject: Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia - to be
worn by midshipmen, Merchant Marine
Reserve.
References: (a) Supt. N.Y.St.Mar.Acs.ltr (580)Dy
of Oct. 14, 1942.
(b) Art. 16-9, Uniform Regulations,
U.S. Navy.
Enclosure: (A) Copy of BuNav ltr. Nav-1644-XKS
(QR2(C)(66) of Oct. 4, 1941.

1. As midshipmen, Merchant Marine Reserve, at the State
Maritime Academies are required to wear a uniform
appropriate to an officer, and as these Academies are
under the supervision of the War Shipping Administration,
which succeeded to the training functions formerly
performed by the U.S. Maritime Commission, midshipmen,
Merchant Marine Reserve, under instruction at these
Academies, are authorized to wear the Merchant Marine
Reserve insignia on their Academy uniforms.

/s/ L. E. Denfield,
The Assistant Chief of Naval Personnel.

Apparently, the Maritime Academies had a friend in the Chief of Naval Personnel, as in 1942 the matter was settled in that all cadets may indeed wear the insignia. All of this begs the question: what was this insignia, that caused such a stir of interest among Naval and Maritime Academy officials?

The Merchant Marine Reserve had its beginnings in 1913 when US Congress wrote into law a reformulated the Naval Reserve Force. At the time, the Reserve was separated into five classes, and soon became six:

Class I: The Fleet Naval Reserve:  Consisting of personnel having former active Naval Service.

Class II: The Naval Reserve:  Consisting of persons of the seagoing profession who had served at least two years aboard a vessel on the high seas or larger lakes.

Class III: Naval Auxiliary Reserve: Consisting of persons who had served or were serving in the Merchant Marine of the United States.

Class IV:  Naval Coast Defense Reserve:  Consisting of personnel capable of performing special and useful service in the time of war.

Class V:  Volunteer Naval Reserve:  Consisting of personnel qualifying for the other classes of the Reserve, who were willing to serve without pay in the time of peace.

Class VI:  Naval Reserve Flying Corps:  Consisting of personnel who were from the Naval Flying Corps.

Class III, Naval Auxiliary Reserve, comprised of officers and unlicensed seamen, was the precursor of the Merchant Marine Reserve program, and the one for which the U.S. Naval Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia would ultimately be destined.

Insignia for the Reserve was first prescribed in “Changes in Uniform Regulations United State Navy, 1913 No. 10” in 1915. This was the first official publication of distinctive uniform elements for the entire Naval Reserve. At the time, those Merchant Marine Officers in Class III wore their steamship line or company uniform with the Naval Reserve Force device on the collar of the “military coat,” or on the lapels of the “box coat.”  This device was a miniature of the commissioned officers cap device. There were also special buttons worn on Merchant Marine uniforms. The button field was plain, with an anchor and the letters “U.S.” on either side of the shackle above the stock, and with the letters “N.R.” on either side of the shank between the stock and the flukes.

On June 25, 1938, the Naval Reserve Force underwent a name change to become simply the Naval Reserve. The classes were reduced to three with the original Naval Auxiliary Reserve renamed the U.S. Naval Merchant Marine Reserve, and still remaining the class III program. The “Naval Reserve (Merchant Marine) Insignia, Special Distinguishing Insignia for certain licensed officers” as it was first known and later called the “breast insignia of the Merchant Marine Reserve, U.S. Naval Reserve (Eagle and Scroll badge)”, was approved for wear on Merchant Marine uniforms on April 7, 1938, by then Secretary of the Navy, Claude A. Swanson. This insignia replaced the miniature cap device and buttons originally approved for the Naval Auxiliary Reserve. The authorization for the aforementioned insignia was the Merchant Marine Act of 1936, in which it was stated: “Licensed Officers who are members of the United States Naval Reserve shall wear on their uniforms such special distinguishing insignia as may be approved by the Secretary of the Navy.”  The 1936 Act was based on the earlier Shipping Act of 1916 that required officers serving on vessels receiving a Federal government operating subsidy to be, if eligible, members of the United States Naval Reserve. Other Naval Reserve officers serving in merchant ships in positions that required them to wear “a uniform appropriate to an officer,” were authorized to wear the insignia. The insignia was emphatically not authorized to be worn with the naval uniform. Moreover, enlisted men of the Naval Reserve were not permitted to wear the Merchant Marine Reserve insignia.

As authorized in 1938, the Merchant Marine Reserve insignia was composed of a gold embroidered bronze or gold plated metal pin consisting of a spread eagle surcharged with crossed anchors and shield 5/8in in height, 2-3/4in from tip to tip of wings; length of anchors 7/8in; and underset with 3/16 scroll bearing the letters “US” on one side of the shield and “NR” on the opposite side. Wearers were required to wear the Merchant Marine Reserve insignia on the left breast of their Merchant Marine uniform and nowhere else.

The eagle design is based on the original eagle carved into the stern of the USS Constitution. The scroll pattern was often found on the stern of ships and contained the ships’ names. The shield has 13 stars and stripes with crossed anchors taken from the then current US Navy officer’s cap device and recalling the original Naval Auxiliary Reserve insignia. Following the design of the cap device, the original insignia design had the eagle looking to its own left. In 1941, Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox prescribed a change wherein all Navy insignia bearing eagles were henceforth to have the heads facing their own right. According to heraldic law, the right side (dexter) of the shield is the honor side, and the left side (sinister) indicated dishonor or illegitimacy. The suggestion also has been made that the change was to have the eagle look toward the olive branches on the left side and peace as appears on the Great Seal of the United States, rather than the warlike arrows to the right. More information may be found here.

The 1930s was a turbulent time. The U.S. shipping industry was in free fall due to the Great Depression, with foreign firms having taken over most overseas and making strident end-runs in domestic shipping. As war erupted across Europe and Asia, the belligerent nations, which once carried the majority of U.S. trade, swept their ships into national service, leaving the U.S. both lacking in both ships and men. The Federal government stepped into the fray by subsidizing ship construction and encouraging the training of young men to enter the trade, and the U.S. Navy found itself looking for warm bodies to man its ships in the eventuality of war in Europe and in the Pacific. Naturally, the U.S. Navy looked to Nautical Schools and Merchant Marine Academies for potential manpower. Nevertheless, manpower could only be had with concessions from both sides: military and civilian.

At the invitation of the Navy Department, an informal conference of the governing bodies and Superintendents of the State nautical schools was held in Washington from April 12-14, 1938. The conference was attended by representatives from the then four State schools: New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and California. The object of the conference was to bring about a closer cooperation between the Navy Department and the State nautical schools; also to coordinate the work of the four schoolships. The end goal was to create a professional class of ship officers both adequately trained for the rapidly modernizing maritime industry and serve as potential U.S. Navy officers. Never before had a closer relationship between the two been groups been attempted.

Captain Felix X. Gygax, U.S.N., Director of the Naval Reserve, in the Bureau of Navigation, presided over the conference. The opening addresses at the conference were made by Captain Chester W. Nimitz, U.S.N., Assistant Chief of the Bureau of Navigation, Navy Department, and Captain Gygax. In referring to the State nautical schools, Captain Gygax said:

The Navy Department acknowledges and commends the splendid results that have been achieved, as attested by the fine record of the graduates of these nautical schools at sea, and the success of many more in positions of high trust and responsibility in connection with the administration and operation of the maritime industry ashore.

The conference resulted in the following: First, the curricula of the State nautical schools were extended with schools preparing young men not only for service in the American Merchant Marine but also in the United States Naval Reserve. The following nine naval subjects were added to the course of study: Navy Regulations, Naval Law, International Law, Types and Characteristics of Naval ships and aircraft, Tactics and Manoeuvering, Ship Drills, Gunnery, Communications and Damage Control. The instruction in these subjects was to be given the form of lectures by commissioned and active duty Naval officers. Second, the Bureau of Navigation, under the authority of the Secretary of the Navy, issued instructions to local Naval District Commandants providing for the admission of nautical school students in the Naval Reserve as Merchant Marine Cadets, in accordance with the Naval Reserve Act, approved June 25, 1938. Third, the Chief of Bureau of Navigation and the Chief of Naval Operations recommended to the Secretary of the Navy that appropriate steps be taken to secure from the Maritime Commission the allocation of funds for the construction of suitable vessels as replacements for the then present State schoolships, as necessary; these ships were to be of such a character as to be readily usable as naval auxiliaries in an emergency. The recommendation was immediately approved by the Secretary of the Navy. Thus was the inception of the Merchant Marine Midshipman Reserve program which provided the beginnings of Naval Science Program at the Maritime Academies. The New York State Maritime Academy was the first of the schools to open its doors to Naval instructors in 1939; by the end of the year, a big gun found its way to Fort Schuyler.

NYSMA cadets marching at World’s Fair 1939.

Soon thereafter, with the storm clouds of war looming over the Atlantic, civilian instructors the Nautical Schools joined the Merchant Marine Reserve and sewed the new insignia on their reefer jackets. By 1940 the criteria for valid wearers of the insignia was broadened to include staff officers licensed under the Bureau of Marine Inspection and serving on ships with certificated of registry issued by the Secretary of Commerce under contract with the Maritime Commission. That same year, Merchant Marine officers employed by or under the supervision of the U.S. Maritime Commission and enlisted members of the Naval Reserve who were actually licensed and serving as licensed officers were authorized to wear the insignia. And other Naval Reserve Officers serving on merchant ships or under the supervision of the United States Maritime Commission were authorized to wear it; with the same stipulation that it not be worn on the Navy uniform.

On the coattails of the limited National Emergency of September 8, 1939, Roosevelt declared a National Emergency on June 27, 1940; and finally an Unlimited National Emergency on May 27, 1941. The first declaration brought with it the activation of the Naval Fleet Reserve; the last, all members of the Naval Reserve not in deferred status were called to active duty. Members of the Merchant Marine Reserve immediately found themselves in reserve officer status if on requisitioned ships between the former and later declarations as per the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 Title III Section 302(g). Along with them, on October 5, 1940, cadets of the Maritime Commission aboard these ships were placed on active duty as Midshipmen, Merchant Marine Reserve due to previous Maritime Commission and Navy interagency agreements. By early 1942:

[…]There were 60 cadets serving as Midshipman, Merchant Marine Reserve, on active duty on Merchant Marine vessels taken over by the Navy.

The school ships of the state maritime academies were not taken out of auxiliary status and activated; thus, students and non-Naval Reserve instructors remained unaffected. At the same time, with the allocation of government funds and provision of schoolships, schools (now academies) had their training programs vetted by the Maritime Commission. However, these same instructors became inducted into the Maritime Commission’s uniformed training organization – the Maritime Service. With the final action, came membership in the Merchant Marine Reserve. After the formal declaration of war on December 8, 1941:

The Supervisor,  three Assistant Supervisors, the three District Cadet Training Instructors, the three Commanding Officers of Cadet Schools, and almost all Cadet Training Instructors in districts and at Cadet Schools hold licenses as officers of the Merchant Marine, and commissions in the United States Naval Reserve.  On January 6, 1942, the Navy ordered these Naval Reserve officer instructors to active duty status.

It may be due to creative thinking by a Navy supply officer, a Maritime Commission purser or New York uniform supply house salesman, but Corps of Cadets members began to sporadically wear the insignia in 1940.  This would be due to a perceived de facto, and not codified de jure reserve status of the cadets and cadets holding a nominal officer status.  Ship officers, as defined by U.S. law, are those sailing under or holding a license as issued by the US Bureau of Marine Inspection.  Nautical tradition held that cadets were officers-in-training with rank below the lowest officer grade but rating privileges held by a mid-level unlicensed mariner.  Some shipboard cadets, known as “cadet officers”, previously held licenses but did not sail under them, and could conceivably claim  Merchant Marine Reserve status.  Others cadets perhaps (and did) don the insignia while on ships activated during the first emergency periods.  Either way, on paper this insignia was only valid while in active employ aboard merchant vessels.  If a ship were seized directly by the Navy, cadets became midshipmen – as happened to some merchantmen namely oilers and Maritime Commission designed freighters – and were officially barred from wearing the insignia on their uniforms aboard ship.  Moreover, the regulations did not state that the insignia was not for midshipmen, rather licensed officers.

It is worth mentioning that the personnel of the Merchant Marine, Government Marine (e.g. Army Transport Service and Coast and Geodetic Survey) and Armed Marine (US Navy and Coast Guard) shared similar trades, but diverged in organizational culture. The Merchant Marine sailor of the late 1930s suffered through the deprivations of the Great Depression and union struggles against shipowners. Except for ship officers, many held no particular allegiance to ship or employer. With the Jones Act, foreign colleagues were ejected from vessels, thereby removing skilled labor, and introducing gaps in overall ship manning. Depending on the union, mariners could be militantly left-leaning or thoroughly apathetic in their daily struggle to make a living. The Navy rank and file also came from the same lower-middle-class background as the merchant sailors – although tempered by grueling training and autocratic hierarchy. Men in the Regular Navy took a dim view of civilians and reservists on shore and in their midst. Many officers of the former worked their way from the deck to the pilothouse; a small number came from the nautical schools and academies. Most active Navy officers came from the Naval Academy where they were molded and inducted into an efficient warrior class. It is at this intersection where academy graduates and the service found themselves: outsiders making an entrance into an unforgiving hierarchy bound by custom and regulation. It is no surprise that despite coexisting on the same waterfronts, the two groups held each other at arm’s length.

Nevertheless, only after the formal granting of Midshipman, Merchant Marine Reserve status to all cadets in state and federal maritime academies in August 1942 – some months after the move of the East Coast Corps of Cadets from Fort Schuyler to their permanent home at Kings Point – did the mass distribution of the insignia to all Corps of Cadets members occur. This was done by the administrators of the Merchant Marine Academies, not the Navy. Absent is period documentation indicating Navy complicity. However, the insignia was only granted after a cadet completed preliminary training in basic Navy Science and swearing an oath. This oath was not compulsory but was done by all cadets. In fact, the Maritime Commission distributed a pamphlet depicting the insignia as an award granted cadets: “U.S. Naval Reserve Insignia Worn by Cadets of U. S. Maritime Commission and Officers of Merchant Marine Enrolled in Naval Reserve.”  Interestingly, at the time of press in early 1942, cadets were not yet called cadet-midshipmen.

State maritime academy cadets did not wear the insignia at any point up to October 1942; graduating class photos attest to this fact. The lack of insignia would not be due to the absence of a Naval Science curriculum; a course of study created by a gentlemen’s agreement in 1938, and put into practice in 1939 – which coincidentally was the same year that the Corps of Cadets was invited to the NYSMA grounds by then Superintendent Tomb. Nor did not having Midshipmen, Reserve status; which state cadets were afforded in August 1942. Nor even lack of connection to the Maritime Commission; with accepting federal monies and federal ships with which came Federal curricula and staff. It would be due to a creative reading of provisions of wear of the Merchant Marine Reserve insignia did the Corps of Cadets come to wear the insignia; and a rather conservative reading that state cadets did not. It is notable in that the wide-spread distribution of the insignia to cadets only came with Tomb coming to Kings Point a month after its inception as the first superintendent in April 1942.

Kings Point, from its outset, was linked strongly to NYSMA, although both diverged in raison d’être. The NYSMA was created to educate young men from New York for the maritime industry operating out of the Port of New York. The Maritime Commission Corps of Cadets, to bring young men from around the country without access to state schools, the opportunity to become licensed officers of the subsidized blue-water U.S. Merchant Marine. Thus, having looked at the successful model of staffing, cadet structure and uniforming, the early Merchant Marine Academy had similar components as the NYSMA. There was a strong cross-pollination of Kings Point and NYSMA instructors and potential students, Kings Point copying NYSMA regimental and honor system and using practically the same uniforms. At the permanent establishment of the NYSMA at Fort Schuyler, Tomb hailed the facility as being the future Annapolis of the U.S. Merchant Marine; after his transfer to Kings Point, he hailed the Merchant Marine Academy as the same. As such, there existed a friendly rivalry between the two. The mass distribution of the badge, and with it, a perceived honor status, can be viewed as a slight affront to – perhaps even antagonizing – the older school. NYSMA was hampered by New York bureaucracy and its expansion plans stymied by Federal land use provisos and local political posturing.  In this light, the Superintendent’s letter makes sense; as does that of the Commandant, Third Naval District. In essence, if the upstart institution may have the insignia, then so should NYSMA – or vice-versa. Whatever the case may be, all maritime academies, having their cadets subject to Midshipmen, Reserve status and the blessing of the Chief of Naval Personnel secured the insignia on October 26, 1942 – but not in time for the big New York Navy Day parade just two days prior. Thus, as an administrative matter in 1942, the Chief of Naval Personnel authorized Merchant Marine Midshipmen, USNR, under instruction at the state maritime academies, to wear the Merchant Marine Insignia on their academy uniforms, since these academies were under the supervision of the War Shipping Administration.

Post-war saw a change in the military establishment’s view of the role of the Merchant Marine as an auxiliary and the desirability of Merchant Mariners in its reserves. In 1951, the Navy regulations were revised, and only cadets who were Midshipmen, USNR, at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy were allowed to wear the insignia on their academy uniforms – not on their uniforms if shipping out or serving on commissioned Naval vessels. With the 1952 abolition of the Merchant Marine Reserve under Public Law 467 by the 82nd Congress, came the resultant removing Midshipman, USNR status from Merchant Marine Academy cadets and therefore the eligibility of wearing the Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia. Despite being granted Federal status, having a military character and Naval Science courses, Merchant Marine Academy cadets became simply “officer candidates.”   This touched off a controversy in that one of the selling points in a Merchant Marine Academy (state or Federal) education were draft-deferment or exemption and the possibility to be granted a commission in the U.S. Navy upon graduation. Gone was the pin, escape clause, and privileges. However, due to an administrative oversight, cadets continued wearing the badge until mid-1954 with its overall disappearance on cadet uniforms in 1956. Apparently, the California Maritime Academy administration must not have gotten the memo, as in 1958, 18 of 50 graduates were sporting the insignia; in 1959, however, the insignia was absent. 1964 saw with the re-institution of the merchant marine naval reserve status at Kings Point; only to have it abolished in 1965 and superseded by a Naval Reserve commission for the class of 1968 with accompanying badge reappearance.

The state academies had to wait until 1977 when their cadets became Midshipmen, USNR, of the Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) to pin the insignia back on their uniforms. Beginning in 1980, those cadets who signed a Training and Service Agreement and became Midshipmen, USNR, were also authorized to wear the Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia. Up until recently, all Midshipmen USNR enrolled in maritime training programs leading to a merchant marine license, were eligible to wear the insignia.

With the start of the Merchant Marine Reserve, U.S. Naval Reserve (MMR, USNR) program in 1977, the insignia was authorized for the first time for wear on the Navy uniform of officers by this officer community. The requirement for wear was published in the 1978 Navy Uniform Regulations:

To be eligible to wear this insignia, Naval Reservists must meet one of the following requirements:

a.  Be licensed merchant marine officers who sail on their license at least four months every two years and are members of the MMR , USNR program.
b.  Be officers in the Maritime Service holding merchant marine licenses and who are instructors at Federal, State and Regional Academies, and at industry, or union maritime schools who are members of the MMR, USNR, program.
c.  Be merchant marine officers holding licenses as Chief Mate/First Assistant Engineer/Radio Officer or higher, with eight years of licensed sailing experience and currently employed in a maritime related position ashore, and who are members of the MMR, USNR program.

On June 10, 2011, a change in the Merchant Marine, U.S. Naval Reserve program resulted in it being called the Strategic Sealift Officer program, and along with it a replacement of insignia (OPNAVINST 1534.1D § 12.b.5). The new device, Strategic Sealift Officer Warfare Insignia, will be available in May 2012. Despite patterns yet to be struck:

The SSOWI is approved for wear by officers who have successfully completed the qualification requirements outlined in OPNAVINST 1534.1D. The insignia is gold in color and is two and three-quarter inches by seven eighths of an inch in dimension, reflecting the background of an eagle from the USS Constitution’s stern, crossed naval officer swords and a U.S. shield with fouled anchor from the U.S. Merchant Marine flag. The SSOWI will be available in two sizes (normal and miniature). The normal size SSOWI shall be worn on all uniforms, less dinner dress. The miniature SSOWI shall be worn with miniature medals on dinner dress uniforms (NAVADMIN 164/12 § 2.B).

Good to know, I guess.  To the way of the shadow box and collector the illustrious “Sea Chicken” – once symbol of the larger debate of how Merchant Mariners figure in U.S. National Defense – shall go.

References
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Education.  Public Document 42:  III Annual Report of the Commissioners of the Massachusetts Nautical School for the Year Ending November 30, 1938.  Boston:  Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1938.

U.S. Congress.  Naval auxiliaries for use in the Merchant marine. Hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Naval Affairs, House of Representatives, Sixty-third Congress, second session, on S. 5259, a bill to establish one or more United States Navy mail lines between the United States, South America, and Europe; and H.R. 5980, a bill to authorize the President of the United States to build or acquire steamships for use as naval auxiliaries and transports, and to arrange for the use of these ships when not needed for such service, and to make an appropriation therefor.  Washington D.C.: GPO, August 1914.

Department of the Navy. “STRATEGIC SEALIFT OFFICER PROGRAM.” OPNAVINST 1534.1D § 12.b.5. Washington D.C., June 10, 2011.

Department of the Navy. “STRATEGIC SEALIFT OFFICER WARFARE INSIGNIA (SSOWI).” NAVADMIN 164/12 § 2.B. Washington D.C., May 18, 2012.


Original design of insignia as found in Uniform Board notes 1938.
usnr badge design


Dating the Merchant Marine Reserve Insignia is not very tricky. There are two main variations in design and two types: stamped metal and embroidered. The former continued to be worn until 2012 with planned phase-out in 2013. The embroidered device fell out of use in the mid-1950s along with all embroidered badges on US Navy officer uniforms. It has the interesting quality of being one of the longest-lived badges in the Navy and least awarded.

1938-1941
usnr insignia

The first pattern, as noted in the text is the own left-facing eagle.  It was issued until mid-1941.

This specific item is part of a Panama Railroad Steamship Company pursur grouping.  It is displayed along with a Merchant Marine Defense Ribbon; meaning it was worn at least until mid-Second World War.

1939-1940
usnr insignia

usnr insignia

This is a gold-plated pin from the pre-war period.  It was issued prior to mid-1941.  The insignia lacks a hallmark; as is the case with many pre-war items.

This item is of particular interest as it comes from a U.S. Maritime Commission Corps of Cadets cadet grouping dating to the regiment’s sojourn at Fort Schuyler.  Of interest is the fact that the original owner was relatively old at the time of enrollment, being 22; meaning he was probably a “cadet officer” and sailed under his license until Navy enlistment in 1943.  At the time college students were less apt to drop their course of study to join the Corps of Cadets, with hawsepipers making up a handful of cadets during this period.

1942
usnr insignia

usnr insignia

This is a Vanguard insignia that comes from a U.S. Merchant Marine Academy graduate that ended up being a junior radio officer; or a radio officer attached to the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. Further research is required on my part.

usnr insignia

1943
...

The above is from March 1943 granted after the Acceptance of Appointment as Midshipman, Merchant Marine in the U.S. Naval Reserve.

1944
usnr insignia

usnr insignia

Embroidery of the insignia was still of a high standard in 1944. Notice the overall difference with…

1945
usnr insignia

usnr insignia

1946
The following two insignias are from 1946.  Do note the difference in embroidery.

usnr insignia

usnr insignia

The first is on a black wool backing for wear with the USMMA dress jacket as well as on the Service Dress Blue coat.

The second is on a khaki twill backing; it was sewn on the khaki working coat.  This is an unusual example, as previously, cadet-midshipmen were directed to wear the pin device on khaki – khaki was commonly steamed, as opposed to dry-cleaned like the worsted wool.  When the pin was reinstated, this failed experiment was not repeated, as khaki working coats were no longer in a cadets-midshipman’s sea bag.

usnr insignia

The third device, with a Coro hallmark, also dates from the same period and was worn on dress whites of the period.

usnr insignia

usnr insignia

usnr insignia

2010
usnr insignia

The last item is a Vanguard insignia from 2010.  It was manufactured by International Insignia in Providence, Rhode Island.  Many Vanguard insignia items are actually jobbed out to International Insignia as Vanguard in recent years has apparently found contracting low volume orders more cost effective than striking them inhouse.  Notable would be the occasional IOH I-21 as opposed to V-21-N hallmark.

usnr insignia

USMMA Academy Achievement Ribbon for Meritorious Service


Academy Achievement Ribbon for Meritorious Service

As a personal decoration, it is the Academy’s highest award for service. Yet, in precedence, it factors below that of the Academy Commendation ribbon. It is awarded to Midshipmen officers for exemplary leadership skills – such as performance and execution of duties during Indoctrination – or for extreme sacrifice and dedication to others. In regard to latter, members of the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Emergency Medical Service and others involved in triage and care of victims of the 9/11 attack in lower Manhattan in 2001 earned the award.

The actions of one Midshipman involved in supporting 9/11 victims – Matthew Walden Freeman – gained the recognition of U.S. Congress in the wake of his untimely death in 2005 – two weeks before his graduation.

In 2017 the name of the award was shortened to “Academy Achievement Ribbon.”

Awarded by the Commandant to Midshipmen who demonstrate outstanding personal achievement in the areas of professional development or military/maritime training. This includes actions directly beneficial to the Academy or the Regiment of Midshipmen. Any member of the Regiment or Academy staff can nominate an individual for this award by submitting a written recommendation form to the Regimental Evaluation Officer (REO). This is the highest personal award that can be awarded to a Midshipman by the Academy. (Aqua stripe worn inboard) Subsequent awards shall be indicated by 5/16 inch gold and silver stars. (USMMA MIDSHIPMAN UNIFORM REGULATIONS, 11 August 2017)

The ribbon design is the same as a Merchant Marine Combat Bar ribbon, only rotated 180 degrees. Curiously, this ribbon’s stock is neither maintained at either the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy nor is available from any military or school ribbon supplier.

torpedoed seamen’s club insignia & merchant marine combat bar

In the summer of 1943, the War Shipping Administration announced merchant seamen could apply for a series of ribbons Congress recently legislated for, and the President wrote into law. These bits of cloth and metal represented the American merchant seamen’s sacrifices made in service to the nation, and they came when the merchant seaman’s morale was at an ebb in the face of a protracted war. These same decorations were latecomers among the several pins and ribbons already available via union and other government channels, yet, as intended, they eclipsed all others. Among the new awards, the Merchant Marine Combat Bar represented the crux of merchant seamen recognition and became a ubiquitous marker of the combat-proven merchant seaman. It is arguably central to the U.S. Government’s understanding of how many merchant seamen experienced the rigors of war – it began as the “Torpedoed Seamen’s Club” insignia.

In 1920, the law to create a medal honoring merchant seamen who participated in the Great War expired. Congress did not extend the deadline owing to inadequate recordkeeping to identify merchant seamen who possibly qualified for the medal. In 1943, the U.S. Government was not so hindered. With the United States’ official entrance into the Second World War, the entire deep-water American Merchant Marine fleet fell under the umbrella of the War Shipping Administration (WSA). For the duration, merchant seamen aboard these ships became quasi-employees of the U.S. Government. Due to agreements negotiated with labor unions and shipping company management in early 1942, the U.S. Government acted within established industry parameters:

  • The U.S. Government paid and gave merchant seamen their salaries and insurance.
  • Unions placed men on ships through hiring halls.
  • Steamship companies (also known as “managing operators”) as the U.S. Government’s agent, issued paychecks.

Before ship-out, seamen were duly credentialed and checked by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Thus, the bureaucratic process was in place for tracking seamen as assets of the United States in triplicate, and the potential for them to receive awards and decorations by the federal government.

As soon the United States declared war on Japan and its allies in December 1941, Germany dispatched a contingent of U-boats and positioned them off the United States’ eastern seaboard to prey on United States’ shipping. As a result, merchant seamen found themselves unwittingly thrown into the crucible of unrestricted submarine warfare. Absent were basic protections such as coastal blackouts, patrol aircraft, minesweepers, or military escorts. As a result, a great many seamen received otherwise preventable death sentences as the Germans attacked and sank their ships. Censorship rules prevented reporting the full breadth of the catastrophe in mass media, but it did not avert seamen from talking to each other.

Cover of Full and Down, Fall 1942. Yearbook of the U.S.M.S. Officer’s School on Government Island, Alameda, California.

It may be argued that the European Theater of the Second World War was won on the factory floor.  It may be further argued that the United States’ ultimate success in Europe rested on the logistics process.  Unhindered by the exigencies of war, American industrial output reached its zenith mid-war. However, it is often forgotten that early in the war, the United States faced numerous set-backs: its supply-lines to its overseas colonies and bases were severed, and its merchant fleets were sunk quicker than shipyards could replace the tonnage.  Success only came with a steady stream of men to man the ships.

In this critical period, military planners schooled in von Clausewitz understood the grim calculus of numbers. The U.S. Maritime Commission sponsored building merchant ships cheaply and quickly, and the WSA embarked upon production-line style training of merchant seamen. Instead of mandating riveted hulls that could weather the shifting pressure of ocean waves, they chose welded constructions – they were cheap and modular – but brittle; ships did split in two. Since the overall investment was altogether low, they were not concerned if the ships sank after a convoy or two and or met its fate by a torpedo. Engines for the same ships were not the best – logisticians determined there was safety in numbers. Instead of depending upon speed to evade the enemy, merchantmen depended on the defensive screen of air cover or naval escorts.  Since the delivery of war materiel was essential but could be replaced, convoys often contained shipments in duplicate. The unspoken rule was WSA planners expected high numbers of casualties; true to this assumption, 1942 saw some of the highest losses in terms of Allied and Neutral ships by tonnage and, by extension, their crews.[1] To the United States Maritime Commission’s credit, their maritime architects focused on automation, thus reducing ship complements and the WSA had maritime instruction beginning with lifeboat drills. But, in the mathematics of death, like frontline soldiers, merchant seamen were all expendable – to an extent.

The popular conception of merchant seamen at the time was not altogether positive. American opinion was colored by the violence of the past several decades in the docklands and the idea of seamen as wards of the state; workers on the waterfront were coarse and involved themselves in union agitation which often resulted in bloody riots. In January 1943, the press tapped into these negative sentiments – and having passed censors – circulated a fabricated story where seamen reportedly refused to unload their ships at Guadalcanal. Citing their contract did not cover working on Sunday, the seamen left the task to tired marines.  The story struck a chord with the public – there was an outcry that while marines died selflessly for their country, seamen selfishly thought only of themselves.  A Congressional Hearing determined the story was patently false and informed by anti-union bias, but the stigma remained.[2] Recruitment efforts stalled, and morale sagged. Yet, merchant seamen were needed to do a vital job more than ever. The loss of potential seamen trainees was devastating; the WSA understood the keen need for replacement hands. Even late in the war, Admiral E. S. Land reported:

E. S. Land. “War Shipping Administration Offers Plan to Aid Merchant Seamen: Seven-Point Legislative Program Recommended to Congress At Request of Representative S. O. Bland.” The Log, October 1944, Vol 39, No. 11, p. 80.

As 1942 wore on, patriotism only ran so high. Many merchant seamen left the fleet and saw their fate as a soldier or sailor better off than death at sea. In sum, morale was terrible and needed a lift.

After the passage of the law that resulted in the eventual creation of Merchant Marine Distinguished Medal in April 1942, concrete action by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Congress to honor merchant seamen was noticeably lacking.  Instead, a subtle game of one-upmanship of granting merchant seamen distinctive insignia to mark their status as bonafide patriots transpired between the WSA and maritime labor. February 1942 saw the creation of the U.S. Maritime Commission-sponsored Maritime Eagle, a version of which became a de-facto decoration in May. Published before a Congressional hearing in September 1942 on legislation to create a distinctive insigne for merchant seamen, LIFE Magazine included a feature on National Maritime Union pins in its 24 August 1942 issue;[3] this same hearing resulted in the Maritime Eagle being stricken as an award.[4]

Thus, up until 7 October 1942, merchant seaman had only the U.S. Naval Reserve badge as a decoration they could earn from a federal source – and these were only available to officers and cadet-midshipmen. Otherwise, only their employers and unions offered a small number of awards to seamen. The most noted among these were those from United States Lines and NMU.  The former was awarded for lifesaving and gallantry, the latter for being torpedoed. Both awards were members-only, leaving the rest of the industry without recognition for their employees’ or members’ trials.[5] Finally, the first award of Merchant Marine Distinguished Service Medal on 8 October 1942 to Edwin F. Cheney, Jr. came, and the relatively obscure “Torpedoed Seamen’s Club” insignia the day after. The latter was a “ribbon bar similar to that worn by members of the military” for a to-be-named “Club for Torpedoed Seamen” or “Seaman’s Honor Club.” Even though this club’s insignia was inaugurated one day after the first award of the Merchant Marine Distinguished Service Medal – to Congress, however – both were mentioned in the same breath. This point is significant: the Merchant Marine Distinguished Service Medal honored individuals who proved themselves as paragons of the spirit of the American Merchant Marine; the insignia recognized the struggles and triumphs of merchant seamen who experienced and survived combat.


A group of “Torpedo Club” members, U.S.M.S. Officer’s School on Government Island, Alameda. Fall 1942.

By February 1943, the unnamed club extended beyond its original focus of torpedoing and shipwreck. It covered “all classes of seamen who have faced enemy action in the line of duty” on a vessel attacked or damaged directly or indirectly through enemy action, in addition to the abandonment of a vessel due to enemy action. Each eligible seaman received a ribbon bar of the club and a star for each time the ship is lost through enemy action.

In September 1942, Representative Francis E. Walter of Pennsylvania promoted a bill to further recognize merchant seamen due to perceived inertia. His preamble to the bill read:

Although Representative Walter’s intentions were admirable, U.S. Congress quashed the bill in committee the argument ran that merchant seamen were civilians and needed no further recognition since they had a medal on the way.  The next bill – H.R. 132 – came before the House sponsored by Representative Schuyler Otis Bland of Virginia, then Chairman of the House Committee of the Merchant Marine and Fisheries, and it too was quashed but later rolled into H.R. 2281. This last bill was introduced in March 1943; it only reached criticality since the press reported in February that General Dwight D. Eisenhower wished to award merchant seamen military medals for their bravery and service in the face of the enemy. With the Maritime Eagle debacle undoubtedly in mind, Admiral E. S. Land approached President Franklin Roosevelt to allow the military to decorate seamen as a morale booster. Instead of military decorations, the American Merchant Marine gained a small constellation of ribbons and medals of its own mostly due to the impassioned pleas of government-friendly tanker union advocates John J. and Agnes Collins. After some back-and-forth and a practical rubber-stamping by the U.S. Senate, the bill was presented to President Franklin D. Roosevelt on 5 May 1943, and written into Public Law five days later; thus becoming the culmination of the third attempt for proper recognition of the services of merchant seamen.[6]

Within the bill’s text, all the Merchant Marine service awards gave the appearance of duplicating or having parity with those of the Armed Services. All these decorations had U.S. Navy analogs except for the Merchant Marine Combat Bar. The Combat Bar was unusual because it was created as an Honor Bar, as evident in the House Resolution mandating its creation:

Moreover, the Combat Bar was actually the Torpedoed Seamen’s Club insignia; the law gave it “statutory basis” which removed it as a WSA administrative award:

Nevertheless, the Merchant Marine Combat Bar was a decoration in a class alone without an analogous place among military campaign or unit awards. Its potential analog among military honors would be the yet-to-be-created Combat Infantryman Badge.  Less than a year after its creation, a reported 50% of veteran merchant seaman enrolled at the U.S. Maritime Service officers’ schools wore the ribbon, and 30% had a silver star affixed to it.[7] By war’s end, the WSA awarded the ribbon 114,145 times.[8] The last date of award of the Combat Bar was 26 March 1957.

Although the period for qualification for the award of the ribbon has long since expired, a version of the Merchant Marine Combat Bar, albeit with the bands rotated 180 degrees, is on the books as the United States Merchant Marine Academy’s “Academy Achievement Ribbon for Meritorious Service.”


design & wear

torpedoed seaman’s club insignia
The Torpedoed Seaman’s Club was an informal organization, so there were no membership cards or certificates, simply a ribbon bar. It appears that merchant seamen were given their lengths of ribbon to fashion or job-out their insignia. U.S. Maritime Service upgrade schools had clubs for each class as early as October through December 1942.  Unions were notified of availability for their rank and file in February 1943. However, I have not seen the insignia in wear except for a single instance in combination with the USMMCC “Enemy Action – torpedoed ribbon” in June 1943.

Cadet-Midshipman William M. Thomas, Jr. at the award ceremony of his Merchant Marine Distinguished Service Medal (June 1943). Note the Enemy Action – torpedoed ribbon to the right of the Merchant Marine Combat Bar with one silver star. There is the distinct possibility that the former is a “Torpedoed Seamen’s Club” ribbon. Col.: AMMM

The Torpedoed Seamen’s Club insignia’s design was distinct for the time.  Unlike military ribbons of the period, it used horizontal bands of color. As design elements, the colors were evocative of the condition that governed membership in the club: service aboard a ship attacked at sea. The bands represented the teal blue of a clear sky, the deep blue of the ocean, and a red band between the two of white representing both a ship ablaze and valor.

From top to bottom, the bands were:

Light blue
White
Red
White
Dark blue

A silver star was attached to the insignia for each instance of forced ship abandonment. The star was 3/16″ with a single ray pointing upward.

As for its size, the ribbon was 2” wide x 1/2” tall. It was designed to stand alone on the wearer’s chest. The dimensions matched those of ribbon bars given to United States Maritime Commission Cadets for honors; the width also corresponded to that of the highest civilian decoration of the time: U.S. Treasury Lifesaving Medal.

merchant marine combat bar
With the passage of H.R. 2281 on 10 May 1943, the club insignia was deprecated renamed the Merchant Marine Combat Bar.  Although sizes were not specified in the legislation, the size of the ribbon was changed to match that of ribbons of standard U.S. Navy size: 1 3/8” wide x 1/2” tall (length); although manufacturers often used U.S. Army ribbon dimensions of 3/8” tall.

Its initial precedence fell immediately behind the war zone bars and before the Mariner’s Medal despite it being mentioned first in the law. WSA regulations in November 1943 called for a space of 1/4” between all ribbons, matching the practices of the U.S. Navy. As the war progressed, ribbon order changed, once again following the U.S. Navy example: personal commendation and combat-related ribbons first, with campaign ribbons following. The practicality of spacing ribbons was no longer desirable, and by mid-1944, they were placed on medal bars colloquially known as racks or sewn in continuous bands on blues. The Secretary of the Navy approved all ribbons to be 3/8” tall at this point, although the wider format was still found in the fleet with formal deprecation in April 1949 and prohibition by March 1951.

Despite its statutory basis, the wear of the Merchant Marine Combat Bar – as well as all Merchant Marine medals and ribbon bars – on the Armed Services’ uniforms was a mixed bag. Since the American Merchant Marine was not a recognized, armed service de jure, all Armed Services took a dim view of Merchant Marine ribbons, but these positions changed as more merchant seamen joined the services in the post-war era. The U.S. Army explicitly prohibited their wear despite General Eisenhower wishing to award medals to some deserving merchant seamen. The U.S. Navy approved their wear only after bureaucratic inertia was overcome in April 1949; when found on U.S. Navy uniforms, the silver star follows U.S. Navy rules by having two rays of the star pointing upward. After the U.S. Navy, the other services followed suit.

from: The Naval Reservist: News of Interest to the Naval Reservist, Bureau of Naval Personnel, NAVPERS 15653, October 1949.

It is not uncommon to find both the Torpedoed Seamen’s Club insignia and the Merchant Marine Combat Bar in the wartime mementos of merchant seamen and among them, lengths of ribbon as well. It is of note that seamen did not receive ribbon bars, rather award cards that (barely) fit into their seaman’s identification wallets. They were free to purchase ribbons of which they qualified at their own expense – this tradition set in 1943 still holds at the United States Merchant Marine Academy today (July 2020).


gallery

Variations of the Torpedoed Seamen’s Club insignia & Merchant Marine Combat Bar

Variations of the Torpedoed Seamen’s Club insignia & Merchant Marine Combat Bar

award card

Merchant Marine Combat Bar award card – cut down to size.
Period Second World War Merchant Marine Combat Bar Award card and ribbon at the American Merchant Marine Museum. (click image for more details).

on uniform

Ribbon rack.
Sewn on blues.

The above uniforms are circa 1944 and were once owned by the Kings Pointer, David Upham. The story behind the silver star on the Merchant Marine Combat Bar and more images of the uniforms are here.


notes

[1] Joshua Smith, “Allied and Neutral Shipping Losses by Month, 1939-1945.” (https://www.academia.edu/5535799/Allied_and_Neutral_Shipping_Losses_by_Month_1939-1945).

[2] United States. Congress. House. Committee on Naval Affairs on Sundry Legislation Affecting the Naval Establishment, “Serial No. 29: Hearing of Subcommittee on Misbehavior of Merchant Seamen at Guadalcanal, 5 February 1943,” 78th Congress, 1st Session. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1943.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Naval Affairs on Sundry Legislation Affecting the Naval Establishment, “Serial No. 30: Report of Subcommittee of House Naval Affairs Committee appointed to investigate the alleged misconduct of merchant seamen at Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands,” 78th Congress, 1st Session. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1943.

[3] NMU’s creation of a gold pin of valor and torpedo pin was created in mid-1942 for those who survived enemy attacks. See: Ian Millar. “The Torpedoed Seaman’s Medallion of the National Maritime Union.” The Journal of the Orders and Medals Society of America, October 1991, Vol. 42, No. 10, pp. 30-33. And: “NMU: It is a union fighting a war.” LIFE Magazine, 24 August 1942, pp 77-82.

[4] United States. Congress. House. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, “Recognition of American Merchant Seamen: Hearings Before the Committee on the Merchant Marine and Fisheries, House of Representatives, Seventy-seventh Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 7548, a Bill to Provide for the Issuance of a Device in Recognition of the Services of Merchant Sailors. 30 September 1942,” 77th Congress, 2nd session. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1942.

[5] As noted, NMU had two decorations: a medal for bravery – usually awarded for lifesaving – and the gold pin of valor and torpedo pin – for surviving a torpedoing.

[6] The report which accompanied H.R. 2281 included a synopsis of all legislation for recognition of merchant seamen; the below is a list of all passed and failed attempts:

1942
H.J. Res. 263
“Decorations for heroic service in the American merchant marine”
Introduced: 12 February 1942
Approved: 11 April 1942; Public Law 524.

1942
H.R. 7548 (77th Cong.)
“Recognition of American merchant seamen”
Introduced: 30 September 1942; sponsor: Hon. Francis E. Walter.Dropped.

1943
H.R. 132 (77th Cong.)
“A bill to provide for the issuance of a device in recognition of the services of merchant sailors”
Introduced: 6 January 1943; sponsor: Hon. Schuyler Otis Bland.
Dropped; resurrected in H.R. 2281.

1943
H.R. 2281 (78th Cong.)

“An Act to provide for the issuance of devices in recognition of the services of merchant sailors”
Introduced: 29 March 1943; sponsor: Hon. Schuyler Otis Bland.
Approved: 10 May 1943; Public Law 52.

[7] Richard Donovan. “U.S. Merchant Marine Training Program.” The Log, July 1944, Vol 39, No. 8 “1944 Yearbook and Review Number,” p. 234.

[8] This number includes multiple awards to the same individual; that is: affixing stars. The number of Torpedoed Seamen’s Club insignia awards is unknown although it would be safe to assume its numbers are included with that of the Merchant Marine Combat Bar. Please see: Irwin R. Abraham. U.S. Merchant Marine Decorations and Awards. Author Edition, 1966, p. 25.


additional notes

Regarding General Eisenhower and military medal to the American Merchant Marine, please see:
Toni Horodosky. “Wartime Memos: U.S. Merchant Marine an Armed Force” http://www.usmm.org/fdr/armedforce.html

war zone bars

Background

At the time of their creation of these “ribbon bars,” morale was flagging among merchant seamen due to high numbers of sinkings, long trips, and desperation on the part of the War Shipping Administration for bodies to crew their ships.

Just as the Army and the Navy were awarded ribbons for participation in the various theatres of war – with the promise of a  later issuance of a medal – the same was true for merchant seamen.  Merchant ships sailed into various war zones, and these were divided neatly into Atlantic, Mediterranean-Middle East, and Pacific along with complementing ribbons. Unlike the military’s ribbons, the Merchant Marine war zone bars did not bear any appurtenances.

Below, find the legislation responsible for the creation of the ribbon bars followed by a brief description of each. Unlike the set precedence of military ribbons, the Merchant Marine awards were worn in the chronological order in which they were earned. At the time of their creation, they had no corresponding medal; this changed in 1992.

Each war zone ribbon bar was authorized by Public Law 52 of the 78th Congress; curiously enough, the original start date for qualification was 3 September 1939, however, this was struck on the day of passing of the legislation without argument. This was later remedied by the creation of the Defense Bar – albeit pushing the date of qualification to 8 September 1939 – the day of President Franklin’s declaration of Limited National Emergency. 2 September 1939 was a watershed date as the German U-Boat U-30 sank the SS Athenia, a British-flagged unarmed civilian ship with 28 American casualties; at the time, the world was outraged.

It is worth noting that unlike the campaign ribbons issued to the military, where the period of eligibility ends on 2 March 1946 – the end of the Second World War – the period of eligibility for Merchant Marine War zone ribbons varied. The Atlantic and Mediterranean-Middle East War Zone bars period of eligibility was defined as between 7 December 1941 and 8 November 1945, with the Pacific ending on 2 March 1946. Compounding issues, the Merchant Marine Victory medal’s cut-off date for eligibility is 3 September 1945.

In terms of actual award, merchant seamen were required to petition the War Shipping Administration for War Zone Bars; upon receipt and review of their sailing history, the WSA would then mail the petitioner a cardstock “Award Card” and not the actual ribbon itself; merchant seamen needed to buy their own ribbons. This same tradition held sway at the United States Merchant Marine Academy until at least 2017 – any ribbon award earned by a midshipman must be purchased by the awardee.


Legislation

Law Establishing Merchant Marine Service Emblem, War Zone Medals, Combat Bar and Mariner’s Medal, Service Flag and Service Lapel Button §1(b).

AN ACT 

To provide for the issuance of devices in recognition of the services of merchant sailors.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Administrator, War Shipping Administration, is hereby authorized to provide and issue (a) a seamen’s service insignia of appropriate design to any person who, at any time during the period (hereinafter referred to as the war period) beginning December 7, 1941, and ending with the termination of the present war, serves on any vessel in the American merchant marine, and (b) a seamen’s war zone insignia or device of appropriate design to any person who, at any time during the war period, serves on any vessel in the American merchant marine while sailing in any war or combat zone.

May 10, 1943 [H. R. 2281] [Public Law 52]


Although the legislation for the award of the war zone bars was published on 10 May 1943, several months passed before the actual notice for the design and qualifications for the awards.  This happened on 23 September 1943 and was published in the Federal Register, Vol. 8, 25 September 1943 p. 13070.


Atlantic War Zone Bar

Qualification

The Administrator, War Shipping Administration, was authorized to provide and issue a seaman’s war zone insignia or device of appropriate design to any person who at any time during the war period served aboard any United States Merchant Marine vessel that sailed in the prescribed Atlantic War Zone.

The Atlantic War Zone comprised the North Atlantic Ocean, South Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea, Barents Sea, and the Greenland Sea.

Description

Designed by the Merchant Marine Awards Committee, the ribbon is silk moiré, ⅜ inches tall by 1⅜ inches wide, with a center stripe of crimson, edged with white that gradually blends into light crimson edges. At the time, the ribbon was said to be flame-red, reminiscent of a ship ablaze.

Number Awarded

235,298 Atlantic War Zone Bars were issued for the qualifying period, 7 December 1941 to 8 November 1945.

Atlantic War Zone Award Card

Mediterranean-Middle East War Zone Bar

Qualification

The Administrator, War Shipping Administration, was authorized to provide and issue a seaman’s war zone insignia or device of appropriate design to any person who at any time during the war period served aboard any U.S. Merchant Marine vessel that sailed in the prescribed Mediterranean-Middle East War Zone.

The Mediterranean-Middle East War Zone comprised the Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, Arabian Sea, and Indian Ocean west of the 80th meridian east longitude.

Description

Designed by the Merchant Marine Awards Committee, the ribbon is silk moiré, ⅜ inches tall by 1⅜ inches wide, with a narrow center stripe of white flanked by narrow stripes of green flanked by wider bands of yellow with narrow stripes of crimson, white, and navy blue extending to the edges.

Number Awarded

150,184 Mediterranean-Middle East War Zone Bars were issued for the qualifying period, 7 December 1941 to 8 November 1945.

Mediterranean-Middle East War Zone Bar Award Card

Pacific War Zone Bar

Qualification

The Administrator, War Shipping Administration, was authorized to provide and issue a seaman’s war zone insignia or device of appropriate design to any person who at any time during the war period served on any vessel of the U.S. Merchant Marine while sailing in the prescribed Pacific War Zone.

The Pacific War Zone comprised the North Pacific, South Pacific, and the Indian Ocean east of the 80th meridian east longitude.

Description

Designed by the Merchant Marine Awards Committee, the ribbon is silk moiré, ⅜ inches tall by 1⅜ inches wide, with a center stripe of red flanked by stripes of white and navy blue, the latter bordered by crimson and yellow, which extends to the edges.

Number Awarded

177,926 Pacific War Zone Bars were issued for the qualifying period, 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946.

Pacific War Zone Bar Award Card

☆ ☆ ☆

An “around the world” ribbon bar with Atlantic, Mediterranean-Middle East, and Pacific War Zone bars

Design Notes

Some War Zone ribbon bars appear in the format ½ inches tall by 1⅜ inches wide; this is due to the fact that initial wartime suppliers of Merchant Marine ribbons followed the precedent set by the United States Navy; United States Army ribbons at the time were ⅜ inches tall by 1⅜ inches wide. This is due to the fact that there was no set, uniform rule on how ribbons were affixed to uniforms, nor even size. However, beginning in 1944, most manufacturers switched to the Army’s style. By the 1950s, in an effort to standardize ribbon sizes across services, the military settled on ribbons with the format ⅜ inches tall by 1⅜ inches wide. From this point forward, the Navy format was dropped.

The manufacture of War Zone ribbon bars was suspended in 1954; this is due to the cessation of the United States Merchant Marine wartime awards program on 21 December 1953 (18 FR 8730); when ribbon manufacture restarted in 1992, the manufacturer of the new ribbons was unable to replicate the old blending, and the stripes are rendered in stark bands. This manufacturer specification was upheld and codified by the Institute of Heraldry.